FREEDOM via TORTURE

Ho Ho Ho, any war apologists ready to step up and defend the shannagins re Baghdad prison?Of course its not representitive of America. Not like the genocide of the indeginous population, the electric chair, slavery, and the indiscriminate bombing of civilians. WHOs game to explain?

Forums: The Bar,

I read a couple of US blogs and *noone* is defending the behaviour of soldiers in Iraqi prisons. From what I've seen, most US citizens are as horrified as the rest of the world.

I hate to think that there will be military personnel higher up the ladder that should be held accountable, but will probably escape the debacle relatively unscathed. However, I'm pretty tired of anti-american sentiment, and this time around I'd rather focus on what the american government is currently doing to fix the problem (after all, it was an american investigation that brought the whole situation to light), rather than tackling the entire country based on the actions of a bunch of trained thugs.

//I read a couple of US blogs and *noone* is defending the behaviour of soldiers in Iraqi prisons. From what I've seen, most US citizens are as horrified as the rest of the world.

Maybe noone is defending it, but some people are trying to justify what the soldiers did, because the soldiers lives are under constant threat, Saddam would have done worse, etcetera etcetera.

Senator Inhofe is a clownboat.

// *noone* is defending the behaviour of soldiers in Iraqi prisons

indeed, Sen. James Inhofe seems to think it's not worth worrying about, as they're all criminals anyway, and when did we start treating criminals with any humanity?

"I am also outraged that we have so many humanitarian do-gooders right now crawling all over these prisons looking for human rights violations, while our troops, our heroes are fighting and dying," he said.

"These prisoners, you know they're not there for traffic violations," said Inhofe, whose senatorial Web site describes him as an advocate of "Oklahoma values."

"If they're in cellblock 1-A or 1-B, these prisoners, they're murderers, they're terrorists, they're insurgents. Many of them probably have American blood on their hands and here we're so concerned about the treatment of those individuals."

"I'm probably not the only one up at this table that is more outraged by the outrage than we are by the treatment." [He was sitting at a Senate Armed Services Committee meeting at the time]

which has inspired what is hopefully small amount of support amongst some of the more extreme right-wing bloggers...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1133796/posts
"Hooray for Inhofe! Finally a Republican Senator with some guts to stand up, instead of trying to outdo the Democrats in handwringing over a few terrorist prisoners."

http://www.greatestjeneration.com/archives/001868.php
"God bless Senator Inhofe--"outraged at the outrage!"
"And while our military guards are alleged to have committed acts of sexual humiliation on their terrorist captives, none of those people died or even suffered any significant injury."

(This latter one is obviously unaware of the investigations into at least three prisoner deaths that have been classed as homicide).

For a good list of current deaths of Iraqi (and Afghani) prisoners in US custody, try the link below.

eg.

"Kunar province, Afghanistan, June 21, 2003: An Afghan at a U.S. holding facility near Asadabad dies. He was captured on June 18; his death was announced on June 23. The military has said the cause of death is under investigation. This death may have involved a contractor working for the CIA. Intelligence officials say the case also is under investigation by the agency's inspector general."

external link ]

//Saddam would have done worse,

That's the one I've seen, but I think it's more a knee-jerk reaction to the (real or anticipated) anti-yank backlash, and goes hand in hand with "at least we're trying to put it right".

I imagine a lot of anti-war protesters are using the "I told you so" line right now. I hate the way the US went about the war in the first place, I don't think it should ever have happened, but in hindsight, I think it's a good thing that Saddam is out of power. I don't think this is an issue that the anti-war protesters can use to back up their own stance retrospectively, nor is it particularly helpful to try and do so anyway.

OK, obviously "noone" is a bit of a stretch. I stand by all the other stuff though. Tired of the extremists at the opposite end of the argument.

c'mon Heather ... US are not a Brothers and Sisters of Charity Association ... we know their "experience" ... so, pls what a shame ... those who are really "tired" of "extremists" are the people who were killed in a non-sense war... and in the Saddam dictatorship too... And we also know how US have been controling dictatorships in South America (another shame), so, why couldnt they do the same in Iraq? I cant believe their secret services couldnt do it better if they wanted to "erase" Saddam. There are NO excuses...

Have a look in the US Military Budget
==FUTURE YEAR MILITARY BUDGET AUTHORITY (Function 050)
FY 2002 $350.8 billion
FY 2003 $396.1 billion
FY 2004 $405.0 billion
FY 2005 $426.2 billion
FY 2006 $447.5 billion
FY 2007 $469.6 billion

...and also who is controlling oil in Iraq now ...
... and who appears in this pic ... http://www.faculty.sbc.edu/gdenn/rumsfeld_hussein.jpg
... and many many many arguments against US policy and Irak War ....

I have no problems with people from US, but US governtment foreign policy is an insult to our inteligence... then, why cant I shout out:

Yankees Go Home!!

ps: in my country we also know the non-sense of extremism ...and not only after 3/11 ... and I can see "clear as water" who is "Goliat" in all this story.... saddly, I dont see where is David

a war is not a tool to change a régime ... and consequences are so horrible like the war.
now I was listening that awful rat called Donald Rumsfeld on the radio, he is visiting Iraq .. pfff

// "I've stopped reading newspapers," Rumsfeld quipped to the troops here. "You've got to keep your sanity somehow. I'm a survivor."

survivor? .. how can anybody be so pathetic?

Yanky Wake Up! ... What you reap is what you sow

Interesting that in today's paper (ODT at least), Rumsfield has stood up and said that maybe the US has, agaibn, picked a war it won't actually win.

Yeah, I know I'm starting to sound pro-war/US government lackey and I'm really not. Frankly, I'm relieved that the US military have finally had their imperfection made so obvious. I'm also quite unnerved by the prevailing attitudes I've seen in the different blogs I've read - stubborn, defensive, and often emotionally manipulative. I don't think they even realise that they all sound the same.

However, my main point is that I don't think this new issue should be about Why We Hate America. I know in principle the head of the military is responsible for every one in the lowest ranks, but that's not how I feel. A bunch of military personnel got out of control after being put in a situation that we can't really comprehend, and they did some terrible things. To me that shouldn't be a reflection on America - the reflection will be the punishment that the offenders get, and the steps they take to try and improve conditions and training for their officers, so I'd like to reserve judgement until then. Basically - America's already got enough to answer for without having to try and defend itself against this as well.

Actually, Finlay McDonald said something interesting on bFM this morning - basically he's surprised that people are so shocked about it. This is the kind of thing that happens during wars - what makes people think that the americans are somehow immune..

i'm sure some iraqi's who had been downtrodden for the last few years would have hoped....

// This is the kind of thing that happens during wars

Interesting, isn't it? It's just the release of the photos that have really made everyone get up in arms about it. When you hear of vague 'prisoner rights violations' via text in newspapers or other media, it just doesn't hit home - photographs just pack that much more emotional weight. I heard an Amnesty International rep on National Radio a couple of days ago going on about the fact that they had compiled [x] reports (where x was some number into the hundreds, but I can't remember off the top of my head) of prisoner abuse by coalition forces since the 'end' of hostilities last year. They'd been releasing all these to the media, but it was still flying pretty low in most peoples' radar. Lo and behold, a few photos get out, and bam! Frontpage headlines around the world.

//photographs just pack that much more emotional weight

Explains why trawling the american blogs has become a minefield of trying to avoid grisly Nick Berg photos.

//Explains why trawling the american blogs has become a minefield of trying to avoid grisly Nick Berg photos.

I Condemm what these Al Qaida fucktards done to Young Nick Berg and to be honest i freaked out when that Al Qaida retard pulled the knife from his Jersey but i must say this is what happens to America when they try to fuck with other countrys internal affairs. Again i condenm what these terrorist done but Americas foreign policy of Bigotry, Arrogance and Self-Centering is just asking for these things to happen.

So america goes to war to free poor innocent Iraqis from Torture but here they are Practising acts of Torture against the very people they came to free.

AMERICA MAKES ME SICK, FUCK AMERICA AND THERE ARROGANT FUCKED UP WAY OF LIFE

i apologize for my bluntness but what i say is true - America are the REAL Terrorists here.

//AMERICA MAKES ME SICK, FUCK AMERICA AND THERE ARROGANT FUCKED UP WAY OF LIFE

what does that mean sam ? - i think you sound as close minded as the so called 'america' object you are bashing... please don't generalise so harshly...it makes me sad

You may aswell say FUCK NEW ZEALAND, because our way of life is virtually identicle where it matters. Except that we don't bully other countris into accepting unfair unfair trading terms.

//Except that we don't bully other countris into accepting unfair unfair trading terms.

Actually, I heard somewhere that we do, but (much like every other western country) only countries littler than ourselves, so obviously it doesn't leave much room for bullying.

again everybody i do apologise for describing my objection to US so harshly and unprofessionally, maybe it was the drink that made me say it so harsh but i stick by my point - America is all about Bullying, Manipulation and quite frankly calling it the "Land of the Free" is completely absured. There foreign policy is all about bullying ie. get outta line with us, no matter how allied you where in Previous wars, we'll bomb you to hell. And to add extra - i have nothing against American People - Its just The Governments since 1945 which have been arrogant, pigheaded and greedy and i cannot blame any country for standing up against American Aggression.

i hope this clarifies the matter

//You may aswell say FUCK NEW ZEALAND, because our way of life is virtually identicle where it matters.

bullshit!
we don't have 20,000 or even a proportional number of gun deaths a year
we don't have a vast arsenal of nuclear weapons
we don't have en masse crack-cocaine addiction
we don't have the death penalty
we have a completely different governmental position
we have don't have a history of racial discrimination that even scratchs the US's
we haven't ever started a war against a foreign country
our government takes interest in the environment(kyoto)
we have a reasonabally generous beneficiary system
we don't torture people
i can think of at least 10 countries we are 'more identical to' than the US
i mean while you're at it RDOR, why not just say FUCK THE WORLD!

and we alos have the luxury of being a small inconspicouse coutry at the bottom of the world

to add it more in-depth to Chris' post.

MAY GOD BLESS NEW ZEALAND. AND HOW LUCKY WE ARE TO LIVE IN A COUNTRY SECLUDED FROM ALL THE WORLDS TROUBLES.

thanks chris, i am quite impressed with the new improved lucifer_sam

// only countries littler than ourselves, so obviously it doesn't leave much room for bullying.

yeah, but we don't pull out our guns and waste a couple of thousand if they don't buy our butter

No, but we will backhand gun deals to get paid for our butter. Anyone here speak Russian?

got any details?

Hell no, I throw stuff out their to infuriate Rdor.
Once upon a time their was a large communist nation that imported a few million tonnes of butter from a nation that was small and not aligned to it. Big Red told Little Black "we have no money for you but you may have these excess Kalashnikovs to export to whatever Dictator needs to supress his general population... thus a few hundred blacks where shot but the Dairy Farmers and their Board rejoiced in the knowledge that they had been paid".
If you substitute "foreign aid" with "military hardware" your more often than not on the mark.
Is their a lesson in this story?
What does it tell us about our priorities?
And who was the Nations Secret Service that brokered the deal?

foal you have provided a wealth of intriguing info today
1500 points!

You know, things like we're seeing in Iraq have no doubt gone on forever: no matter what ideals by what a country may live by, they will engage in behaviour like we're seeing. I think that the people safe in their middle class lives have preferred to not think about what thier armed forces, their security forces and even their police forces have to do to maintain their nice safe middle class lifes. I think its more than a little hypocritical, now that they're actually confronted with these practices to get all up in arms about them.

I don't know if the torturing in Iraq is being done for the amusement of the guards, I don't know if those being tortured actually have anything worthwhile to reveal. If not, or if the guards are simply engaging in gratuitous acts of humiliation, then I don't see any basis for what they're doing. On the other hand, if these practices are being engaged in in respect of people who might actually be able, under compulsion, to reveal where Bin Laden, the killer of the Berg fellow, or other dangerous psychoes are then I think they have merit.

We have our nice middle class values and its all very well saying that everyone is entitled to be treated in accordance with them, but it does lead to the situation that people who don't share them, in fact do their best to disrupt them by various acts of terrorism, can be protected by them. Is it such a bad thing, when people do show contempt for such values, to occasionally give them a taste of their own medicine. I'm not saying that is what is happening in Iraq at the moment, because I don't think any of us have enough information to make that call, but there seems to be an attitude that this kind of thing is NEVER appropriate and with that, I cannot agree.

so basically an eye for an eye?

//if these practices are being engaged in in respect of people who might actually be able, under compulsion, to reveal where Bin Laden, the killer of the Berg fellow, or other dangerous psychoes are then I think they have merit

that'll be a first for interoogation techniques,
how to break the prisoner;
1) take off all their clothes and put a dog collar on them

Not so much an eye for an eye, as a recognition that the ends might sometimes justify the means - not necessarily in the particular example you mention, as I took pains to point out.

i think i understant what you're saying

//to reveal where Bin Laden, the killer of the Berg fellow, or other dangerous psychoes are then I think they have merit

but i think it's a waste of human recources
i don't think Osama bin laden is such a valuable a target that it's worth killing people to find him
he's just the publicly acknowledged head of the AlQuaida
i don't think if the US brutally beat 10,000 arabs to death and finally managed to capture Bin Laden that the the terrorist 'network' would suddenly lay down their weapons and surrender
personally i see them as doing nothing than fueling the terrorists hatred
seeing as Bush is campaigning on the grounds that he is 'the president who can handle war/conflict'
it is in his regime's best interest to incite more terrorism
with the actions that have recently come to light...

And what about suicide bombings? Any UN resolutions comdemning those?

Whoops, that previous reply should be for the next thread?

whoops, wrong place

//We have our nice middle class values and its all very well saying that everyone is entitled to be treated in accordance with them, but it does lead to the situation that people who don't share them, in fact do their best to disrupt them by various acts of terrorism, can be protected by them.//

I'm tempted to agree with that....... although what happened to those Iraqi prisoners was ultimately digusting

BUT AT LEAST NONE OF THEM HAD THEIR HEADS CUT OFF WHILE THEY WERE STILL ALIVE

I can't imagine a greater degradation of human life than that displayed by those Al Qaida animals, I wanted to be sick.

//Not like the genocide of the indeginous population, the electric chair, slavery//

Foal you make a whole load of easy generalisations, just what has americas colonial past to do with the war in Iraq? What relevance does that have? And what is wrong with the electric chair? - you might just have to explain instead of stating as if it was some sort of substitute for an argument

The one I wanted. No offence Heather.
Reveiw the footage/print of the immeadiate aftermath of the expose of the publiciation in mass-media of "prison atrocities". The overriding concern and vocalization of the "commander in chief" is that the Arab world dosenot take this as symptomatic of either the American pshyce or American culture.The 4 items I listed were a line on my thoughts that the soliders are acting in a time honoured tradition of brutalisation and indiffererence to humans who do not fit the critera of white, rich, and for all extent and purposes Christian. Why would Arabs in general be more suseptiable to the notion that this behaviour is "normal" or standerd operating procedure of Americans. Black Americans or more correctly poor Americans recieve this treatment every day from the Police forces, some of whom now work in the very prision where this footage emited from.
"We went to export democrocy", and we'll torture you till you get it.
"Imminent threat of WMD" the threat was their and in use for 25 years, it just that those now invading where making $$ selling the gas, choppers and guns and the only people then recieving our excess stock o' gas where those troublesome Kurds. And as we all know a Kurd's worth less than a Turk.[ask Slick Willy if you dont believe me].
"We will ignore the majority of our peoples consenus and invade accordingly", hardly the Democratic principles we wish to foster ? Of course our democrocy is weighed on our ability to buy advertising although I expect that aside will be a redrag to a bull Dear Rdor.
"Decapation vs Beaten to death", nearly would describe this as a nonsensical position, i'll defer to your obvious intellect and assume that i've missed something in the reading. Live feed of beheading or clubbed behind closed doors is the same bottom line. That human has no worth and I am sanctioned/OK'ed/ noble in my faculty as executioner.
"The Electric Chair", unquestionablly torture. 100% American invention and if you dont think this is cruel and unusual punishment then Lord knows theirs no hope.
Violence is Violence is Violence and someone is making money off this Iraq mess and it aint Mr and Mrs Abduallah of Sth Fallaujah. One hopes that a most righteous revenge is elicted upon the architects of this bank balance driven disgrace. Every single one of us who holds Democratic princaples as a staple for free expression and a defining mark of community worth should condemn not only the physical perpatrators of these barbourous deeds, but also the heirarchy that trains, orders, encourages, and rewards the dehumanization of others. And your mate Simon Power wants us to"unquestionably follow our traditional allies, whereever and whenever they call". Champion democrocy all you want, the forces in the blue/right corner will have your vote and tax dollar paying for any atrocity as long as it fits the criteria of "national intrest", or "growth/profit". Anyone remember East Timor? You are what you vote... vote accordingly.

Forgot to mention if youve ever heard of a country called Saudi Arabia Rdor? seeing as public beheading is so revolting. Their a big recipetent since 1945 of aid from this country whose name is on the tip o' my tounge... Can you say it?

//The 4 items I listed were a line on my thoughts that the soliders are acting in a time honoured tradition of brutalisation and indiffererence to humans who do not fit the critera of white, rich, and for all extent and purposes Christian.//

That's a pretty long bow to draw, considering that many American soldiers are black/hispanic and/or from low socio-economic status and are not 'Christian' for obviouse reasons. Even if I were to accept that Americas current intervention was a symptom of an 'American psyche' I'm not sure how useful placing everything into that historical context really is. Surely we judge a nations/administrations actions on the info provided, not for eg. on the missapropriation of american indian land some 200 years earlier. Maybe the 'war on terror' is abomination, but not for the reasons you provide, ie because it's America. I also don't think that making enemies of 250 million people, a good deal of whom have brains and are capable of empathy, is really the way to go. Pointing out hypocrisy is not isn't very uselful either.

I could take that another step - the U.K should not have got involved in 'peacekeeping' in Cosavo
why?
The Saxons displaced the native Britains in the 5th century
The Norman invasion of England in 1066 led by William, responsible for the fuedal system
War with the French in the 15th century
The British empire
Obviousely these people are inherently violent and shouldn't be involved in anyone elses international affairs
Ridiculous
Maybe there are good reasons, but none of the above egs qualify

I wasn't aware that any Iraqi prisoners were actually killed when I posted - so comparing abuse to murder made sense at the time, and the electric chair (compare that to being raped and murderd, or having your head cut off while your still breathing for that matter) - it's all opinion but you state yours as if it were fact.

...again I'm not argueing with you over the war in Iraq, rather with the way you give your 'arguements', It's annoying.

like my spelling mistakes

So at no stage do you think the reaction to white people dying is different to the coverage of others deaths? Particulary those deaths from the actions of our beloved exportors of democrocy.
Longbow to draw, maybe for you, as you find the connection obviously tenuous at best.
Many of the army are black, Carlton Ridentour has some good things to say about this and of the far reaching malaise of the Africian-Americian. Sports/Entertainment/Armed Forces... all to do with knowing your place and the hangover of slavery. James Baldwin's got some top books too.... Hideous Dream by Stan Goff [soft skull publishing] may outline the indocrination of racism as a form of discipline in the US Military.[no im not implying that is solely an American tech]. However SSP is notoriously leftwing so tread carefully.
If anyone takes this as anti-american THEIR A FUCKING LOSER. The diatribe is directed at the nonelected govt which continually besmirches Americas reputation. The standers and belifes that Americans hold dear are not adhered to by the Bush regime. This is not to say that Kennedey, Johnson, Nixon, Reagen, and Satan snr were any better.Some action to remove the clowns and killers who make such barbourous actions justafiable to the feebleminded minority would be greatly appriciated.This is Democrocy, kill and maim in my name and your out. Hopefully Labour UK have a sharp knife for Blair.My parents didnt classify themselves as rasicist when Muldoon let the Boks in '81, they got off their fuckin arses and protested, they also voted and shopped accordingly. Rdor why does American soliders and citizens have immunity from ICCJ? Does this not strike you as odd? All ideas, explanations welcome.
Specific reasons to bitch about Bush in Iraq
He himself is a dictatoral killer, POT KETTLE BLACK
His regime is continually in bed/ endorsing/funding terrorist and illigitamate states.
Many of the anti-war mob were the very same people calling for Saddams head in 1981....still its only the Kurds and swamp Arabs eh Rdor?
This cabinet are all profiting directly from this "invasion", as they did selling the gods when Saddams money was too good to turn down;ie the Press dont bother with photos despite the fact their was plenty of gassed babies bodies available.Or is this the face of acceptable Capatilism... Profit first, Principles a remote second.
Violence is unlikely to solve anything, unless you want some phantom terrorists pre-election [check the polls Ashcroft].This is not to say that I consider my belief system set in stone Rdor, as I have yet to have myself or a member of my family falsly imprisiones, tortured, suicide bombed, raped, had my kids walk on landmines, etc. Its possible that when provoked I may re-act in a way I currently think reprehensible/irrational/selfdefeating.
Care too enlighten me with non-annoying and more worthy reasons to be against the continuing Imperalist march of the USA?
Electric Chair? Of course its a fact, i believe it their for it is.... what else can I say , you believe something it becomes true, some people believe in trickledown economics and evolution, clearly asmuch fairytales as anything the Bros Grimm designed, yet zealots, believers, worshippers abound. Thier choice, their loss/gain.
Hopefully finally, as ive posted before the onus is on us to inform, eludicate and pontificate not on our designated eniemes like Hussien, Kim JongII, Chavez, Castro etal but on the crimes we and our traditional allies are enacting for our supposed benifit. If 250 million Americans get upset that theirs some clown in Chch asking for the standerds they hold sacrasant to be held also to their actions, then i trust their rage will be directed where it should, at their Elected Representitives.
Has your depression subsided? The Koran always lifts my spirit, you might want to try it.
Eludicate your rational behind why this war is unjust, i'd like to know the reasons you think "Bush is a Facist" and how you catorigize importance. Please should be in their too sorry.
Take care and chinup, if youve gottime to waste on my baiting things cant be too bad.

Sorry Rdor, I have never posted or said that "the war on terror is an abomination", be it Americian run or whoever. At no stage should anything ive posted be read as such, and I apologise unreservadly if my posts implided as much.
I have no truck with USA but I have no hesitation in describing the Bush regime as the Agents of Satan.

Logical arguments against the war in Iraq have are so well understood that I don't feel the need to type them all out here. What bothers me about your posts is that you disguise one argument with another ie The present U.S administrations invlolvement in Iraq thinly veils an all out disdain for 'western civilisation'. Apparently because we in the west drive cars, live in suburbs, take part in a largely consumer driven economy, have an average lifespan of 72 instead of 45, and use up plenty of resources in the process, while the rest of the world lives in variouse degrees of poverty - we morally have no right to use military force in countries that don't share such a obscenly high standard of living. Which is actually a fair enough argument if you were honest about it in the first place.

And what about suicide bombings? Any UN resolutions comdemning those?

Is the bulldozing of homes the crime of the century? There is slavery and actual genocide in Africa that no-one seems to care about.

//And what about suicide bombings? Any UN resolutions comdemning those?

I don't know, are there? Google isn't helping.

//Is the bulldozing of homes the crime of the century? There is slavery and actual genocide in Africa that no-one seems to care about.

So you're saying that, because there are worse thing happening in the world, we should just forget this? Are the lives of Israelis more important than Palestinian lives?

Israel is accountable to the UN. It is a member state. Why does it constantly ignore worldwide opinion, as well as international law?

The Israeli Minister of Justice was quoted today as saying the perps of the bulldozing should be heading to ICCJ
If a few more elected reps can speak up against injustice like this their is hope for peace.
The question still remains however, what happpens to those who deny Israel right to existence?

// The present U.S administrations invlolvement in Iraq thinly veils an all out disdain for 'western civilisation'.

it doesn't strike me as a disdain for western civilization,
it's clearly a disdain for the way the west is administered

//Apparently because we in the west drive cars, live in suburbs, take part in a largely consumer driven economy, have an average lifespan of 72 instead of 45, and use up plenty of resources in the process, while the rest of the world lives in variouse degrees of poverty - we morally have no right to use military force in countries that don't share such a obscenly high standard of living.

what a load of crap,
foal has made it quite clear of his respect for human life
and hence his reasoning.

//violence begets violence...

and what does this shit have to do with the war and torture in iraq
you still feel threatened by whose sane?
thought he might take your microwave oven?
thought he might steal your colour TV?

you can drive a lambourghini or you can barely clothe yourself in this season's fig leaf collection, either way you still have no moral right to pull this kind of shit
whatever your economy, income, and anticipated life expectancy,
play the ball not the man...

and the man said 'iraq has WMD'
when he meant to say 'We want full power of Iraqs oil supply'

//Which is actually a fair enough argument if you were honest about it in the first place

// And what about suicide bombings?
// Any UN resolutions comdemning those?

yes. there's a few, try numbers 1515, 1516 & 1526 for starters. although, none of them specifically mention suicide bombing, but the vaguer term 'terrorist acts' or 'terrorism'. There's a few more you can find via this link...
http://www.un.org/terrorism/sc.htm

technically, since the occupued territories aren't a nation, the UN can't really draw up resolutions dealing with them directly, although, having said that, there are a few condemning specific terrorist attacks (#1530, interestingly, condemns ETA for the Madrid bombings), so perhaps they could pull a few more out of the hat for the more heinous suicide bombings Hamas are responsible for.

// There is slavery and actual genocide in Africa that no-one seems to care about.

Plenty of UN resolutions about those issues - although, again, they did miss the boat on Rwanda.

// Google isn't helping.

No wonder. The UN website is a 'mare to find stuff on, and most of it's in PDF.

http://www.un.org/terrorism/ ]

//So you're saying that, because there are worse thing happening in the world, we should just forget this? Are the lives of Israelis more important than Palestinian lives?

No. What I'm saying is that criticism must be applied proportionately. It is unfair to vilify the Israelis because of the (sometimes excessive) actions of the IDF, yet excuse suicide bombings as "resistance". It is unfortunate that some homes of innocent Palestinians are destroyed, but that's the sort of thing that happens when the terrorists among you operate in civilian areas, and use innocent-looking houses as centres.

//Israel is accountable to the UN. It is a member state. Why does it constantly ignore worldwide opinion, as well as international law?

As soon as the Palestinian Authority and the Arab states accept Israel's right to exist, then we can start talking about resolutions. There have not been any resolutions condemning suicide bombings. Countries commiting atrocities on a grander scale than Israel (including some of its neighbours) are more or less ignored - some of said countries even have a go at drawing up resolutions against Israel. Plus, Sudan sits on the Human Rights Committee of the UN - do a google search of Sudan.

Latest Classified Ads