¿¿HISTORICALLY CORRECT??

--- ¿is there anyone who still actually thinks jesus was white?--- ¿waddabout the nails in the hand bizzo?- this from just the promos

Forums: The Bar,

jesus would have been a nice shade of tan? or a dirty one been that day and age....

whats with the hands?

nails throu the palms of the hand wasn't correct, they are nailed throu the wrists as the hands are not dence enough to not tear.

//jesus would have been a nice shade of tan?

funny you should mention that, me and disasteradio were discussing the fact that the whole crucifiction thing would make for a mean Blaxploitation flick

you could call it "Hook A Brother Up"

and have Jesus (or Hay-Zeus, or just Zeus for short) coming up with gems like "i ain't carryin' no muthafuckin' cross, fool" and such

of course you'd offend a whole lot of people, so it would have to be done in good taste

I've never heard anyone confirm to me for a fact that that is how it was done. I have heard a couple of theories, one like you say through the wrist, and the other which is that they tie the arms to the cross and then nail the hand, this way the person is actually held on by the rope. Besides I doubt the nails would hold a person up in a vertical manner, as there weight would more than likely go forward causing the wrists to pass right over the nails widest point.

Either way, thats such a horrific way to kill someone, also considering that since the victims did not always die from hanging they'd come and smash there legs to finish them.

If you really think about it Jesus Christ was a PERFECT man..Does anyone not know the meaning of a PERFECT man.. I would say he was a lively fair/tan looking guy with the perfect frame, a really handsome face & the beard wouldn't of been as ugly, his body would never have been ever so scrawny as they paint him on those pictures ie: last supper..and he would of been a beaufiful colour to ones eyes.. Imagine meeting him one day...

Jesus was a carpenter, I'd say he would have been pretty rugged and strong.

yeah but he was only a carpenter because it was his dad's trade
and we all know jesus wasn't exactly a chip off the old block

in fact as yet noone's owned up as the father
so for all we know he could have been an aborigine

..er...hello...biblical times are all based in Jerusalem & the middle east..so he must of been that!

you never heard of aboriginal 'walkabout'?

..umb..not when its way across the continent..No I haven't actually.

its a fact that he was aboriginal

woohoo!!!!!!!!!!

//umb..not when its way across the continent.

continent??!....can somebody call a nurse

Okay so aboriginal isn't Australian then?? Correct me cos I dont think he would of been one not that I know for sure but I wouldn't really think he was..c'mon he was PERFECT..not being real sad but would you describe aboriginees with perfection within their looks..

//c'mon he was PERFECT..not being real sad but would you describe aboriginees with perfection within their looks..

classic

yeh- native austalians must have swooned with thumpy thumpy hearts when all those cute europeans landed on their shores & started killing & eating their babies

yeh- thanks for that- yoda

So I guess Australians now own & have adapted the "Real" aborigine family as I had thought.
Thats quite funny but I guess its true.

Are you even speaking English? I can't understand a word you're saying most of the time.

Fact: when after slaughtering "primitives" it was found that Aborigines had not only the same physiology but horror of horrors, the same brain capacity [cc]. this led to the doctoring of the results to make it more acceptable to the European university's who were funding the slaughter/study. the field researchers lacked the morals to not kill other humans but had the intellect to know that by upsetting the theory of the times "eugenics", that their pay check would diminish. i know that we can all take comfort from the fact that such a sorry incident would never be repeated in this the age of Scientific enlightenment.

your knowledge base far surpasses your ability in the use of standard grammar.

gotta hand it to ya lena
you got some damn good funnies

//yeh- native austalians must have swooned with thumpy thumpy hearts when all those cute europeans landed on their shores & started killing & eating their babies

Fact-european settlers did not eat the aborigines babies

Its pretty funny that you its all written in plain english then..

An aborigine is simply a native of a particular country. So the American Indians (Native Americans) are the aborigines of America and so on. So it is highly likely that Jesus was an aborigine.

//would you describe aboriginees with perfection within their looks.. //

I assume you are talking about the indigenous people of Australia.

Evonne Goolagong ... stunning!!!

Now why did I say that for!Bar me from this thread..
(Im not too into this history thing but I do know I believe in the Christ).
Yes too classic for this topic..

Passion Plays were used extensively during the time of the crusades to inspire the masses, to aid the freeing of the holy places from the infidels.............. it was more to do with the spice and silk routes

I just find it so sinister

a film about a dude who is supposed to have died and come back to life
and your concerned about the historical acuracy of the nail placement?!!!

Steady on now Christianity, dear Lena has laid claim to inventing nearly everything of cultural importance to the world, its not a stretch to contemplate her claiming to have given birth to JC. Evidence in her favour: probably old enough
: most eyewitness claim a donkey in the correct manger.

ha ha

so your telling me lena O was that ass?

listen piss stain city- the makers of the film have stated that this is an ACCURATE account- with much eye on detail- its subtitled for gods sake- so im questioning their statement

now that you mention it- fool dirty- god DID approach me when i was young- to ask if i wanted to be the vessel for the second coming- i was pretty grossed out- needless to say- so i turned the offer down- but i guess you could say god coveted my ass

i regret it sometimes- he said the new jesus would come forth & rid the world of plankheads- narrow escape for you ¿huh?

no the film makers said it was there interpretation, I watched the interview, they think they're are correct historically, but do not say they can back that 100%

hm- obviously theyve changed their story since i emailed the fuckers

they consulted the prophet and found out you would call them fuckers
and thought they'd have a joke on you

Your tops Lena. you can have a writers credit from me when I put down "THE LORD HE COVET MY ASS" end April. im expecting however, a somewhat violent re-action from my more militant spiritual bretheren... do you still have bodyguards available? as always Peace and Love...

"THE LORD HE COVET MY ASS"
upbeat 4/4 funk blues
im a dirty fool...
im a low down dirty fool
my only path to salvation
is a naughty nana to take me to school
the lord he covet her ass
i thought he had more class
least I know Im not alone
o Lena pick up the phone!
cos Im a dirty fool
O Lena take me to school
you provide the discipline
I'll bring your medicine
A 9 volt or three
D'arradio chromes for your fender P
Spare lead for PNC
just save your HOTCAKE for me
[ bass solo here]
im a dirty fool
o Lena wheres your school
Low down dirty fool
O lena Im the mule
Now I admit I was cold
to suggest youre 2000 years old
so please baby dont scold
just embrace me in your fold
O......Lena take me to school
you little dirty fool

la bellas actually

Typo... that last line is
Your dirty little fool.

ahh another debate about jesus being black - when i first hooked up to the internet i remember the exact same questions being asked on the Alt. Teens Newsgroup - WAS JESUS BLACK?? WAS JESUS GAY??

as for the 'passion of christ' i think its a movie we should all see. Even the catholic church noted for there hardline conservatism are keeping there minds open about this film.

//Even the catholic church noted for there hardline conservatism are keeping there minds open about this film.

I am absolutely in love with the fact that David Blane is campaigning to get the rating of it lowered - without even having seen it.

why?

that guy david lane riles me man .. .

trying to ban all the cool violently artistic and interesting movies with out even watching them just because he and his fax machine find them offensive, then trying to lower the rating on a violently artistic and not so-interesting movie, just because he shares similar views to those of the guy who directed it. ..

you may or may not remeber that it was him who complained when the censors office banned his church groups anti-gay propaganda videos a while back..

it's not the extreme religious views that annoy me... its the sheer fucking hypocrisy. .. .

ahh i see
joanna was so focused on 'da bling'
she mistook David Blaine for David Lane
I wonder which one would take more offence

David Blaine would be pissed off that Jesus was the centre of attention and not him

Whaaat!! David Baine...Oh no.

lcajmo, there is very clearly an L that you appear to have missed. David Bain is the man accused of murdering his family several years ago, and David Blaine is a great magician.

I apologise, I am new to this information technology, and do not know if by correcting you I have made some kind of faux pas. It is plain to see that you have made a lot of comments. I wish to ask whether or not this is the correct manner in which to compose oneself, the circles I hail from tend to focus more on substance than verbosity.

As to what the status quo is on these forums, I can tell that you hold some kind of esteem, you are on the list of Top 25 posters, so you must be very well regarded. This is why I am asking you these questions.

Thank you very much for your help.

hi rufus, i wouldn't waste your time.

rufus you've made my day

normally I'd stay out, but...

// do not know if by correcting you I have made some kind of faux pas

only in that you'll be banging your head against a brick wall when she points out to you that, no, in fact, *you've* made a mistake, and, you know, she's only saying what comes into her head anyway, so don't get all negative on her.

// It is plain to see that you have made a lot of comments.

ahaha.

// I can tell that you hold some kind of esteem

ahahhahhaaha!!

// so you must be very well regarded.

ahahahhahhah. ahahha. ahhaha. ahhhh, stop it. really, you're killing me.

rufus, your reply is completely fine - corrections to stupid posts are one of the mainstays of this site, in fact. but yes, as grimmy points out, perhaps not in this case, some people aren't worth taking the time to correct, as there's too much to correct. I commend you.