NZ IDOL

There is no place for this manufactured music, if they were that good, they wuld get there soon enuf, but the winner wont be and enjoy about 5 mins of success. Look at all the other winners.

Forums: NZ Music,

yeah it reminds me of what now-win a wish

ha, and that was bad. pop idol is WORSE than that!!!!!!!!

yeah, pop idol is a good way to end a promising career

as a matter of interest...is win-a-wish still going??? or did they can that years and years ago when what-now was Still a saturday morning show?

// Look at all the other winners.

Yes, look at poor Kelly Clarkson, the winner of the first American Idol. The poor, unfortunate girl realised her life's dream of being a professional singer (after previously being rejected by record companies because she sounded black but looked white). Then she went on to more misery by being nominated for a Grammy.

Damn those Idol shows. They just let people realise their dreams and give them support and resources. How cruel!

some people just have no hearts.

the grammy's are a load of shit

i can understand her misery

//the grammy's are a load of shit

couldnt agree more, the Grammys used to reward talent, now they reward who wears the least clothes and popularity over which pop tart can win the next cat fight.

//pop tart
MMmmm... pop tarts...

Breakfast time, I think.

speaking of music awards, i caught part of the MTV (europe?) awards the other night. they had two categories called "best female" and "best male". not best female ALBUM or best male SINGLE, just best male and female.

I would have thought God should win "best male"...

everyone knows god's a women and she already won the grammy back in the nineties for 'jagged little pill'. sheesh even kevin smith knows that....

is that Kevin Smith the American director or Kevin Smith the New Zealand actor?

the grammies have sucked ass since year dot

if you need to ask, you don't get it.

?still doesn't really clear it up

what has alanis morisette got to do with kevin smith?

there's this wonderful thing called google if you really want to know.

//everyone knows god's a women and she already won the grammy back in the nineties for 'jagged little pill'. sheesh even kevin smith knows that....

LMFAO!!!!

thanks for the tip there
still don't get the joke though
alanis played god in a kevin smith movie...
milking the old gag
and this is 'lmfao' funny how?

yeah, obviously
could you explain?

it looks like people are finally learning the truth about these half-baked reality shows

ahh...mt famous trademarked lines "pop idol stars are nothing more than rich daddys boys/girls attention starved spoilt brats" must be winning hearts......

yeah, you are our idol now sam

What about the poorer people who enter Idol shows? Like, people who want to pursue a career in music, but don't have the time because have to work a couple of jobs to support their families?

Why don't their rich daddies come and bail them out?

//yeah, you are our idol now sam

why thank u christianity

in reality Im just a poor unemployed hutt bogan, who if given the estimates would have a one in 6500 chance of ever appearing on TV. and even if it happened it would have been accidental (recapping the 15 second news item of the lower hutt antiwar protest back in april)

Hey Luci!

If you watched the idol thing though, you'd see that most of them aren't actually idol material. I'm actually kinda disapointed that we didn't get someone who fit your description - at least they'd be "pop" material!

i stay well away from such "reality shows" nz muso, i prefer the old time classics of TV. ie. Cosby SHow, Happy Days and MASH re-runs on Prime.

rudy huxtable has more tralent than all those wannabe idols

and more talent

//rudy huxtable has more tralent than all those wannabe idols

hahah - u rock my world christianity bro....keep it real innit? (pulls out lighter, lights up and puts it in the air waving it around like at a gig)

//There is no place for this manufactured music

it's not really about the music is it?

enticing talent contest + suspense + low standards of viewing public
=ratings
=concept sold to other parties and channels etc.
=lots of money for creators of series

it wouldn't matter if it was a year long model railway convention, if the public were willing to watch it, it would be made

//it wouldn't matter if it was a year long model railway convention
man, I'd so watch that shit.

the viewers suk shit. FUK THEM why have these pop people, there target market, the 8-12 females dont even have the muny to bye the albums. every1 suld listen to punk and be happy

nofx isn't really punk tho is it??

hahah classic. Model trains are punk as fuck though.

come to think of it. . .i'd probably be keen on the train thing as well

If u think nofx isnt punk, then u must listen to the spice gurls or sumfing.

Well, I for one *love* da spice gurlz, and I think sporty is so f*&@'in punk ! hah lol man you're so not punk dat you don't watch antiques roadshow ! TTYL GUYZ

//"model trains are as punk as fuck"/ -- absolute gold.
television needs a programme on model trains... maybe on those minituare ones that you ride on as well...

yeah, you ever seen like, the hard-to-the-mo'friggen-core setups ? I went to a pal's house and he has like, chip controllers with digital signals running down the lines, and like.. this thing is huge, a clone of some swiss town, the "mountains" touch the roof. I mean, compare that to say, DOOM or Crass and tell me what's more punk ?

the best thing about punkrock is like, how everyone fights over what's punk and what isn't. I love it. you could make a gameshow like "Is it punk or isn't it ?" and have like, a crust and a socal kid and a hardcore guy and an emo slug it out over a variety of household and non-household objects. That'd be so goddamn punk it'd hurt.

my grandad was into model trains - he was an official Lionel club member - tell that to your local be-mohawked chaos punk contingent and watch the amazement in their eyes.

these contests are a motherfucker. anyone who enters them better be aiming to come second, coz that's where the money is. if you come first you are dumped into contractual obligations that will see you:

1) singing what they tell you to sing (ie: zero creative controll, and zero writing royalties to match)
2) promoting yourself the way they want you to do it (ie: Bardot in aussie spending tens of thousands of dollars on their debut music video)
3) do it all with your own damn money (or at least with money that you have to recoup for the record company before you see a cent, and when they've made you make a $40k music video that's going to take a long time)

John Safran put it better.

winners of these competitions are basically enslaving themselves. at least the runners up get some of the same exposure, but much more clout. i mean, it's no coincidence that after these few years every manufactured-for-tv pop act has split up except for Liberty X (the band of runners-up from UK popstars)

rant rant rant.

// singing what they tell you to sing (ie: zero creative controll, and zero writing royalties to match)

Guy Sebastian, the winner of Australian Idol, has co-written a few songs on his album which I imagine would result in some royalties for him.

// i mean, it's no coincidence that after these few years every manufactured-for-tv pop act has split up except for Liberty X (the band of runners-up from UK popstars)

Oh, and except for Girls Aloud. They haven't broken up either. Pop groups formed through a TV show aren't the only groups who break up. What about all those indie bands who release one album then end up breaking up? Who do we blame for that?

i can imagine guy sebastian in 6 months time - He will be a familiar face of course - but only just down at the Australian Welfare collection and Jobsearch agency.

// i can imagine guy sebastian in 6 months time - He will be a familiar face of course - but only just down at the Australian Welfare collection and Jobsearch agency.

Guy Sebastian was a singing teacher before he entered Australian Idol. If his career as a pop singer falls apart, he still has a real job he can go back to and probably no reason to sign on down at his local Centrelink office.

The label of being the 'NZ idol' is a bad thing, sure, most people expect whoever wins to have a number one hit (whether it's paid for by sony or not) and maybe an album release or two and then they will eventually fade away. Well that's what seems to be the trend anyway. I hope that nz can be different from these other shows, and that we unearth more than one nz idol, and we don't automatically blow off the winner just because they're labelled the 'nz idol'. Someone said that if they were that good, they would make it by themselves anyway. As we all know it's damn hard to get anywhere in the entertainment business and this may be the 'opportunity' that certain ppl (who probably would have made it anyway) have been waiting for. My mates doing really well in this competition, but I hope she doesn't win because of that label, she's better than the 'nz idol' name. No matter how she does in this show, she'll make it anyway, this is just something that will hopefully get her the exposure she needs.

what is it with these stupid half-baked groups - release a single or 2 then 4 months later its back to WINZ. how lame can that be?

if u look at groups such as Black Sabbath, RHCP etc..these bands have been going 35 and 20 years respectively and are still bringing albums out, but the heart of the matter is that With Pop U get nowhere. With Rock 20 or even 40 years down the track you will still be recording new stuff.

she's not a big pop fan, she desn't want to compromise herself for this competition but its a good way to get a foot up and then use her exposure to do her own thing.

//With Pop U get nowhere. With Rock 20 or even 40 years down the track you will still be

many pop acts have had huge shelflives; Michael Jackson, Beegees, Cher, Madonna, Phil Collins, Peter Gabriel....

//these bands have been going 35 and 20 years respectively and are still bringing albums out

have you ever heard the phrase 'flogging a dead horse???'

while a few bands can come up with consistent quality album after album, there's many bands out there that perhaps only ever came up with enough good material for one album but just never knew when to quit (pearl jam, stone temple pilots, green day...&c) the throwaway nature of pop music certainly has its benefits..

// With Pop U get nowhere. With Rock 20 or even 40 years
// down the track you will still be recording new stuff.

Bit of an over-generalisation isn't it? Some pop artists seem to have some staying power: Elton John. Fleetwood Mac. Sting. Cliff Richard. Paul McCartney. Michael Jackson. Madonna. Prince. Neil Diamond. Duran Duran. The Bee Gees. All of whom have been releasing new material pretty regularly for at least 20, and in some cases 30 or 40 (or even 50 - arise Sir Cliff) years.

davewc, sorry, totally missed your post there somehow. apologies for the double-up. And Cher! Of course!

i suppose ur right noizy.....sir cliff has been going 46 years now and still bringing out albums but talk about todays "pop groups" 1 or 2 albums later then its back to collecting welfare, it prooves that music stds have dramatically lowered over the years.