Goldenhorse nomination pulled

This released today...

"Amendment to finalist in the New Zealand Music Awards 2003

RIANZ advises that the entry by the group Goldenhorse has been withdrawn
from the Breakthrough Artist category of the 2003 New Zealand Music Awards.

The conditions of entry for the category state that groups or artists are
not eligible if they or any member of the group have previously been a
finalist in any other Tui category.

This condition was not met by Goldenhorse, a member of which had previously
been a finalist while part of another group.

However the band remains in the running for Best Album and Best Single in
this year's awards.

P-Money is now a finalist and joins The Datsuns and Blindspott in the Xbox
/ ZM Breakthrough Artist of the Year category.

The New Zealand Music Awards are to be announced in Auckland on Wednesday April 30, 2003"

Your thoughts?

Forums: NZ Music,

dumb

cool- as they are putrescence personified

I reckon you should be allowed to be nominated in the breakthrough category for as many years as you want, until you breakthrough and win the damn thing. ;)

ah, my apologies, I was looking at the 2002 bnet nominations.

It seems a little unfair to me that the others should miss out on a nomination because one member has been previously nominated. Also, that was for a different band - it seems crazy that Goldenhorse's talent won't be recognised simply because one person (of five) has been nominated for an entirely different body of work.

It could start getting quite difficult to work out where to draw the line though. How about if there were two people who'd been in different bands that were nominated? Is that OK? Or three? How about if all but one of the musicians have been nominated before, then they can put up the remaining member for the award? What if the member in the previous band didn't even have any songwriting or production credits, or doesn't in the new band, so their contribution may be considered a minor one? (no offense intended to band members who don't write songs; just suggesting it for arguments' sake)...etc

Although I totally agree it's pretty mean to pull Goldenhorse, I think the existing rule is probably the simplest solution for a category that's there to highlight new artists and bands.

I just think a different band is a different band regardless of how many members were previously nominated for categories in the awards for other work. If a whole band just changed their name or added a new member to get a nomination again for this particular category it would be blatantly obvious and they should win an award for being stupid.

// I just think a different band is a different band

So Zwan are up for a Best New Act award at this years Grammys?

//If a whole band just changed their name or added a new member to get a nomination again for this particular category it would be blatantly obvious and they should win an award for being stupid.

Problem is that you can't really introduce intuition (even when it's flagrantly obvious) into the selection process, because there's bound to be someone who will kick up a stink and whack the selectors upside the head with the rulebook.

and think about it- 'breakthrough' is the operative word here.

it's obvious it's breakthrough in ever manner and facet of the band

the datsuns have been around for like nine years... took their time to breakthrough... heh
didn't p-money win something last year, or get in the finals???

since when does ZM play the datsuns or blindspott???
having been forced to listen to the morning show, i've never heard them playing...
does ZM even choose the artists, to me the punter, it seems like ZM play the datsuns blindspott and suppport them kinda like TV3...

ZM has to add them to the playlist because they have sold over the required amount of records. THey might not always play them but I'm sure they have them added.

I think the 'breakthrough' thing is based on the release of a debut album. I've had a look on the RIANZ site and it appears that P-Money hasn't been a finalist previously.

As for the ZM thingee, I'm pretty sure that's just a sponsorship thing, not artists who have broken through ZM. Imagine that... yikes.

This is so unfair. Besides Goldenhorse are way too superior to be bestowed a "Best Breakthrough Artist". Award or not I think they pretty much broke the ice by themselves easily on their merits and their status in public or the music industry shouldn't be judged on what they won or lost at the NZ Music Awards. Goldenhorse are authentic and in a league of their own.

Hey wow, that is SO unfair!!! I dont like waking up to news like this in the (erm) afternoon, gets me all riled up and stuff lol *breathes*

I dont see why a great band like goldenhorse shouldnt get recognised for their achievements just because a current member was nominated in a past band.. have I got this right? Because that sounds so not important at all... it just sounds ridiculous!

But, like AchillesHeel said, goldenhorse have pretty much gone it alone, and done really really well. Still, doesnt everyone want some sort of public recognition for their achievements? Theres no way they'd be judged on whether or not they won, but the fact still remains for me that I'm sure they'd like a nice lil' Tui on their mantle somewhere :)

Good point Janey!

I don't think Goldenhorse really care about public recognition, they said so on Squeeze. Geoff was like at the end "It's kinda ridiculous the attention rock stars get". Ben was like "Well maybe when Fame hits me i might change my mind....."

Though they did put themselves forward for nomination... or at least their record company did.

it is so unfair!

They're brilliant. It's just a loophole in the system in an effort to be fair, that is totally unfair.

Hey, me again ;]

I don't think it's so much that they want recognition as in needing attention, but if you're writing/playing good music then you should share it so more people can hear it and have a good old time and maybe find something new they never knew they liked ;) I mean the more well known you are, the more people are gonna hear your music.

And it's always nice to get recognised for working hard and doing a good job. Whether it's recognition like a Tui, or recognition that you've made someone happy by doing what you do, eg by hearing from some little 19 year old girl who goes by the name of Jemma, that Riverhead gets played on repeat to help her sleep at night. ;] (album on repeat, not song...that'd evoke some weird dreams) 0:)

does breakthrough me 'breakthrough from student to commercial radio'??

http://www.darktower.co.nz/trillion ]

bingo.

I can't recall which band it was, but watching the grammys a few years ago, the best new act award was won by a band who had put out several albums, toured the US for years, and were all in excess of 30 years of age. they seemed as baffled as anyone as to why they'd won the award. It was, of course, because they'd put out their first *major label* album that year.

might have been Hootie And The Blowfish at the 1995 awards. And it was only a couple of EPs and a compilation album. But they had been playing together as a band since 1986.

That could be said of half the bands that win awards.

And "breakthrough" probably does mean breaking through to mainstream - which is what the govt and labels are pushing bands to do obviously.

Just cause a scriptwriter has been penning stories for ages, let's say, with his staple writing partner, doesn't mean that when their first motion picture is released they won't be hailed as the next big thing. I realise Trillion though, with his history of alternative music involvement, was likely to steer down this path. The Datsuns have been playing together for years, but if they win the Breakthrough Artist Award at the Tuis no one will be surprised - that is b/c it is justified in spite of their history as practicing musicians that this year has seen them and thus New Zealand move firmly into the spotlight.

they shouldn't get pulled because of that. his other band wasn't that much of a break through obviously

Thats so stupid. I think that rule should apply in cases like someone mentioned above where there is a few members of a well established band, and definatly in a supergroup or reformation case. But taking them out of the running for this category is just petty, if they hadnt been nominated that would be fine (a little stupid, but fine) but to actually pull the nomination..

Just out of curiosity, what is the other group that one of the memebers was in that has been nominated before?

//But taking them out of the running for this category is just petty, if they hadnt been nominated that would be fine (a little stupid, but fine) but to actually pull the nomination..

Actually, yeah, that's a good point. At the very least, if they're going to exercise the rules they should do it before they announce the nominations. Now the comment's been made by escy on another thread that P-Money is potentially ineligible - what are they going to do now? Pull him as well? Justify his nomination with more bureaucracy? The whole thing's gotten pretty ridiculous.

i think *maybe* it was when ben was in heavy jones trio last year filling in until they found a perment bass player. and heavy jones trio have been nominated the last 2 years for best indie act, but have been beaten by rubicon *are rubicon indie? i didn't think they were*

Geoff and original drummer Joel were in Breast Secreting Cake. They made one record for flying nun, did one nz tour supporting the muttonbirds, made a couple of fruity videos, then broke up. If anyone here loves Goldenhorse and has not heard the BressaCreeting Cake record, then I suggest doing yourselves a favour and tracking it down.In my humble opinion its one of the best records ever made in NZ. BessaCreetingCake were a musicical breakthrough at the time, as are Goldenhorse now. However, they are completely different bands with different objectives and sound.
Ahhh... where would we be without rules?

Unfortunately Joel is no longer with Goldenhorse, but they have found a fine replacement in new drummer, Ben Collier.

Again drummer #7? I swear his name was Vince unless he left.

external link ]

This is nothing short of a crime.

A new band is a new band. It should be that simple. We should be promoting new music not picking at minor details. Beauracracy sucks.

awards shows suck. it's that simple too

Whatever. Rianz basicly slapped me in the face with another decision they made last week regarding the Tui's going to air.

Goldenhorse and great. The album is sublime. Breakthrough artist of the year was always going to go to the datsuns anyway. P-money can't win it if he wasn't nominated in the first place.

And how can you have "nominations" in a highest selling single and album catagory. fuckin' dumb.

Well, I had the dubious, and singularly well-timed privilege of meeting Ben, Geoff and Vinnie Goldenhorse at a gig on Saturday, so I took the opportunity to ask Ben and Geoff what they thought of the whole debacle. They think it's all rather silly and petty, and reckoned the rules get rewritten every year anyway. They were appalled that they've been replaced by P-Money. However, they also insisted that they are old, cynical losers, and described Goldenhorse as "The band of hate".

If I wasn't in love with Goldenhorse before, I am now.

http://taken.withagrainofsalt.com ]

Unbelievable decision!

I would have thought that the spirit of the nomination would have won out over the legal black and whites of it - Goldenhorse easily deserve to be nominated for that award.

The idea of the awards are to celebrate talent, and the legalese of the rules are there to stop bands just blatantly reforming and therefore getting renominated every few years. Goldenhorse aren't doing that obviously. Madness!!

Pete (who is very much looking forward to seeing them live on May 1...)

http://www.petesmith.co.nz ]

Latest Classified Ads