Nz Music Scene

I am currently doing a project at school on the Nz Music Scene. Focussing on the modern music. Examples of this- Salmonella Dub, Concord Dawn, Pacifier, Epsilon Blue, King Kapisi, Che Fu. I know that not all of these bands are ne, but more those kinds of genres.
I have to chose three questions on this topic.
These questions are:
Does Nz have it's own music identity?
What are Nz bands doing for themselves (to make money, be known) ?
What is our government doing for Nz Artists?

Any help, comments or links would be greatly appreciated.

clav-

Forums: NZ Music,

Those are some serious questions....

//What are Nz bands doing for themselves (to make money, be known) ?
You might want to read this debate on artists in television ads
http://nzmusic.com/topic.cfm?i=4080

Q1: yeah , but who knows what it is. i guess it depends what genre of music you play or listen to?
Q2: i don't think many artists can make (decent) money in n.z. and there isn't much money in the industry at a whole, so nz artists have to work that much harder. i guess that could be part of the nz music identity.
Q3: As a metal band the government isn't doing much for us. we rang the council to see if they could help us find a practice space but they didn't give a toss.
There's an artists allowance/benifit you can get but it would be impossible to afford rent,food,gear maintenance/upgrades,practice place rent etc. etc. etc. on that alone.
i think the government has bigger worries at the moment anyway. e.g. child internet porn etc.
i'd say "help out the nz music scene" is around no. 1,982,596,787 on thier 'things to do list'.

Dude - in terms of what is the govt doing etc, you can get a hell of a lot of stuff off the NZ On Air website - they are a govt. set up thing. You can check out the grants they offer etc. Same again with Creative New Zealand also. both have websites - nzonair.govt.nz and creativenz.govt.nz (or something like that - do a google search if you need).

In terms of does New Zealand music have an identity? - a rhetorical question imho.....I would search for any archives of stories on the world series. Try an archive of the one from the Herald (late last year) and/or the one my mate wrote for the APRAP newsletter/quaterly - find at www.apra.com.au (hopefully)

Good luck!

A NZ music identity?

It might have during the flying nun/indie era of the 80's and early 90's
It's more commercial now and probably too segemented into genres for a common sound to happen.
The closest thing might be urban pacific dub/hip hop.

try the PACE programme at WINZ

it still doesn't pay you more than the average dole- not much to try and setup a proper band

Q1- the typical 'NZ Sound' is a rock based sort of genre, stemming from bands that get signed to Flying Nun, but i find that an annoying and somewhat contrived 'sound'. i'd rather associate with the pacific infused RnB, hiphop and Dub that we are getting. otherwise most bands get their inspiration from overseas bands, and bring their own slant to it.

Q2- without any support from either record companies or the government, most bands have to strike it out for themselves. even then that support is only a boost, and does little for totally sustaining the musicians that aquire it. and if you can't develop your own fan base then there's no use aquiring any decent funding, because if you can't do this on your own devices then there's no way you'll last long in the industry. the main thing is inserting yourself in already established 'scenes'. bands then go on to refine their act, try to put out recordings, fund their own tours and basically just hack away at it.

Q3- this has been answered already, and like i mentioned earlier, that though there is a few options out there, they just help out a bit, as opposed to garaunteeing success for the band. it's still a positive thing, but i just think it's wrong if bands think that achieveing grants, funding ,etc. is going to be your big break.

I know this isn't really relevant so sorry I'm new to this forum stuff! Well its to do with NZ music scene anyway! I'm going to be moving to Wellington late April from England, so I'm used to our music culture. From what I can see there doesn't appear to be much difference but what is the music scene like? Is there much in the way of R&B or soul, and whats the rock/gig scene actually like? Any comments appreciated so I can get a feel for it before I arrive!

if you're after R&B there aren't that many live shows, but i can't really speak for wellington. the rock scene is quite vibrant though.

Oikos. What I have to say is not what you will expect to hear. There are thousands of skilled artists in NZ all with industrious intentions in a young rising market. The older USA market is undergoing intensive change. The future is far more dramatic than we could possibly imagine.

When a contract is signed it is deemed to be confidential. The nature of the agreement can not be communicated. Therefore, artists may not communicate with one another and determine possible injustices. The truth is they have been occuring for quite some time.

While the NZ music scene is slowly "coming together" much information is biased coming from within industy itself , and not from artist experience of industry. So your questions are interesting. Where does one go for the truth?

The truth is that the NZ music industry will become what we make it. Are we prepared to unlearn our helplessnes and take ownership and responsibility? This is also an important question.

Contracts are generally like this (I am over simplifying this - but the theme is true). The artists just wants to make the music. The Record Company just wants to make the money and minimise the risks. The artist gets 10%of the gross (turnover) and the record company gets 90%. The production costs come out of the artists 10%. In NZ the production costs are the same as anywhere in the world, but the size of the market limits the income potential. Many artists end up owing the Record Company money due to production costs exceeding the artists gross.

The basic problem is that artists "Just want to make the music" and are not interested in the business. So they give away their power by relinquishing responsibility. The time for LEARNED HELPLESSNESS is fast disappearing as artists realise they are being "milked" like a fresian cow.

The record companies are vital to artists and so artists can not enter into a mindset of blame. Artists must adapt their consciousness to accept they are in the music BUSINESS.

I am involved at the Industry NZ level and have spoken with Cheryll Sotheran. I own several businesses including a record label called Oikos Records Ltd. I find the current system abhorant and I am developing fromt he ground up a new system which is founded on the following precepts; (1) the artists should own their music (2) the artists should own their own business (3) the artists should have creative licence / control.

At the moment Industry NZ is setting up a task force which will determine the direction of the "Creative Industries Sector". Rianz are an importer. Industry NZ is supposed to be about EXPORT. NZ Artists need to be aware that those with power will uphold it unless artists get off their ass and do something. Industry NZ wants to help but looks to those who are obvious. Those who are obvious have their own biases and so the industry will not be represented appropriately.

if you would like to know more you can email me
oikos.adsl@xtra.co.nz

Now is the time for NZ musicians to evolve and understand their true value and potential and to use the mechanisims which are supposed to be there to support us.

I am just one of you.
Oikos.

external link ]

1. NZ has always had its own musical identity. From the Dunedin sound in the 80's, to OMC in the 90's, Split enz and Crowded house, to Shihad and most recently The Datsuns (and next year Nesian Mystik), whenever a band makes the jump to the international stage, the fact that they are from NZ will be used to market the band. It may the their sound, or influences or lyrics, but the NZ identity will be with them, and its a great thing.

2. NZ bands are doing everything and nothing to make money and be known. There are bands out there getting bitter because NZ on air wont support them and radio PD's wont play their songs, and they wont be around in 2 years. There are musicians making a good living in NZ by writing and playing music, its just that they are clever about how they go about it. Greg Johnson makes money by releasing albums, writing TV and radio ads, performing live, APRA cheques doing session work etcetc. The difference is that he's clever enough to have a whole lot of income streams from which he can make a living. then there's relatively new bands who just get of their arses and work hard and dont really care whether they get any industry support or not. Check out the Datsuns or Sommerset.

3. The government does plenty for nz music. I dont know the facts, but i doubt there are many countries around the world that provide the level of support that the phase 4 nzon air scheme does to local muso's. Check out nzonair.govt.nz and all the details are there. There are other avenues of support, but nzonair is the best start.

Good luck with the project!

i don't see the datsuns as having a sound that can be defined as coming from new zealand.

I have to agree that the NZ sound did evolve through the early Flying Nun bands of the 80s and to some extent Garageland and PanAm etc carry that on albeit in a 90s, 00s, style. FN these days is really embracing the lo fi indie sounds which it pioneered via Knox and The Clean...acts such as Pavement, Sebadoh and Guided By Voices have been influenced by the NZ sound IMO.I'm not sure if Pluto sound too much like anyone else, but The Datsuns are really right in the retro rock camp along with The D4...nothing new, but I wish them well and Sommerset is only NZs Green Day...nothing unique there. The sorry thing is that NZ artists feel they have to follow overseas style to become popular here...in the 80s our bands were innovators and really that jangly guitar with refined vocals defined NZ alternative music. True we have always had our share of crap artists, but at the moment I think our music is going through a strong period and my only wish is that more of our bands get breaks like The datsuns because I'm sure it'll knock the socks off the international community

I have to agree that the NZ sound did evolve through the early Flying Nun bands of the 80s and to some extent Garageland and PanAm etc carry that on albeit in a 90s, 00s, style. FN these days is really embracing the lo fi indie sounds which it pioneered via Knox and The Clean...acts such as Pavement, Sebadoh and Guided By Voices have been influenced by the NZ sound IMO.I'm not sure if Pluto sound too much like anyone else, but The Datsuns are really right in the retro rock camp along with The D4...nothing new, but I wish them well and Sommerset is only NZs Green Day...nothing unique there. The sorry thing is that NZ artists feel they have to follow overseas style to become popular here...in the 80s our bands were innovators and really that jangly guitar with refined vocals defined NZ alternative music. True we have always had our share of crap artists, but at the moment I think our music is going through a strong period and my only wish is that more of our bands get breaks like The datsuns because I'm sure it'll knock the socks off the international community

Hey furboy
Know what youre saying - the datsuns "sound" could hardly be described as NZ influenced. But from what I understand the international music media is now going "check out the new wave of garage bands including the D4 and Datsuns from Nu Zeeland!". The point being is that the mere fact that they are from NZ has an influence on how the world sees NZ music.

Strawman "Sommerset is only NZ's Green Day". Ouch that hurt - and you had to say it twice! I really dig sommerset but cant really tolerate Green Day.

C'mon the NZ music scene!

//Sommerset is only NZ's Green Day
yeah WHATEVER!