I was reading comments on smacking in some other forums I post on and was interested in everyone's opinions there. Quite a lot of people believed even a light smack on the hand was wrong.
I believe physical discipline works but of course there are limits to everything. But where do you place those limits for each child? As a child, if I did something really bad i'd get a quick slap. It was rare for my parents to do it, but when they did, I learnt the lesson and moved on.
Do you believe in physical discipline or this new "time out" stuff? Where should the limits be set on smacking? What do you reckon are the idea ways to discipline a kid?


Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Technorati
...
[ http://maddox.xmission.com/beat.html ]
Ha ha ha My mother always use to say ...
Ha ha ha My mother always use to say to me, I only hit you because I love you. She was funny even when she was angry. There is nothing wrong with smacking your kids, if they deserved it. I deserved every single beating I got, and now the young dudes I use to run around with, are now in jail and are proper bad-asses. Yay, for mom... she kept her son away from the bad boys.
well my dad used to have to smack me, ...
well my dad used to have to smack me, omce i reached a certain size mums just didn't hurt and i used to laugh, and it would also hurt her more..
unfortunatly ppl think that hitting ...
unfortunatly ppl think that hitting there children when they 'naughty' or 'bad' gives them power and the right to hit them whenever.
not sure who it was directed at or if ...
not sure who it was directed at or if it was just a statement... but i never said that they just hit me when ever...
I was shopping one day and this kid was ...
I was shopping one day and this kid was playing up to his mother and he wanted an ice-cream or something... So the mother carrying all her bags of shopping told her son "No! We have ice-cream at home, and we need to pick daddy up soon, c'mon lets go". The kid jumps on the ground kicking and screaming at the top of his lungs, giving his mother the fuck-you-bitch look.
Now I secretly love it when mothers absolutely lose it with their kids, I'm cheering for the mother to give him a public dealing to..... But you know what the mother did? She drops all her shopping on the ground and starts kicking and screaming at the top of her lungs for 2 solid minutes. Then after this five minute show they pick up their bags and go home.
That was the best public humilation I've ever seen. More power to the mothers....
ooo, I like that. Haven't tried it in ...
ooo, I like that. Haven't tried it in public, but we pull this 'reverse-tantrum' trick one at home once in a while if Milo's having an irrational paddy about something. It's surprisingly effective. I'd be too shy to give it a go at the supermarket though, not that the boys ever give me any strife there -- a slice of luncheon from the deli keeps 'em quiet for most of the shop.
Amen to luncheon and cheerios!...
Amen to luncheon and cheerios!
Problem is, of course, waiting for a ...
Problem is, of course, waiting for a couple of minutes in the checkout line with bays upon bays of tantalising treats on display. "Can I have a lollipop?" "Can I have a chocolate?" "Can I have a lolly?" I imagine a fair few parent-kiddy tiffs are caused by the refusal of the former to cave in to the latter's requests. What they need (and they may have this at some non-crap supermarkets, which my local New World doesn't number amongst, unfortunately), is non-lolly lanes for parents wishing to avoid a scrap.
Although, those sugar-less lollipops are quite good.
// 'reverse-tantrum' hahaa. thats ...
// 'reverse-tantrum'
hahaa. thats like what i do to my dog when he barks about nothing while i'm trying really hard to sleep. i just go outside and bark right back at him, that shuts him up!
What do your neighbours think? ;)...
What do your neighbours think? ;)
I don't see anything wrong with a ...
I don't see anything wrong with a light smack on the hand or bum
2X4 neva hurt anyone?...
2X4 neva hurt anyone?
2X4?? maths always hurts somebody!!...
2X4?? maths always hurts somebody!!
i think its fine to strike with an open ...
i think its fine to strike with an open hand, hmm, strike sounds harsh, but you know, a slap on the hand or the bum. Also if the parent is angry they'd have to use restrant as they should never strike a child in anger. If the child acts up and telling it to stop does not work, then use the hand, then explain why it had to be that way.... strike with one hand and draw closer with the other or what not.
But as everyone is different some children will react better to physical discipline than others. For instance my parents used physical disipline on me because i was the more 'ruff and tumble, get smart, not afraid of you type' so a quick clip on the arse normally did the trick. My brother on the other hand was not so loud and smart to your face and never got smacked once that i recall, but then he was a deveant that made sure no one was looking..hmmm...
One time Dad did grab his physically and told him off... my brother punched me in the kidney and it left a great big mark, then he tried to blame it on me... i remember dad lifting up my shirt and going 'look at it, look at it'... (big red mark)
I think there is a fine line between a ...
I think there is a fine line between a disiplinary smack and abuse. I also think that when a parent hits a child, that stays with them, they think it is alright to hit another person and will do so. I personally do not believe that hitting your own child is right, same goes for hitting another person out of anger, walking away from the situation is my outlook, though i'm quite a violent person, so this is sometimes hard.
I was hit as a child, not abuse, there are only two incidents i can recall that i would now consider abuse, but as a result of that i fear that when i have children i won't be afraid to use my hand as a power of authority over them. I don't think that is a very healthy enviroment for kids and so everytime my mum or dad gets agro at my little brother and looks like they are going to hit him i make sure to tell them to back off, i don't like it and if they still wont leave it i will make my brother leave the room.
my parents had/have three ways of disciplining me and my sister and brother when we were little, there was the "wooden spoon" threat, the "put out your hands" threat and the "one.......two.........[never made it to three]" threat. all seemed to work, the only one that i seemed to fall into everytime was the "put out your hands" one, man that hurt!, yet i never seemed to get the idea in my head that i shouldn't put out my hands if dad told me too, unless i REALLY wanted red palms for the rest of the day.
i used to be a real agrovated little ...
i used to be a real agrovated little shit when i was little and had the shortest of tempers. i dont know why or when i grew out of it but i sorta grew a brain and realised that it wasnt doing me any good. now i prefer to walk away from situations. not because i fall into this so called "pussy group" cuz i dont see the point in violence and really it only proves who can beat the shit out of who. now i just walk away from most problems and cant really be botherd to get involved. anyway its a lil off topic but i think u shudnt fear hitting ur kids when u have them. just make sure that if ur going to stop urself before u do or teach yourself now not to be violent. :)
good advice moosus. i'm not really ...
good advice moosus. i'm not really violent as in, i fight with someone and i want to hit them, more violent as in - if someone does something to piss me off, i can get aggrivated so much that the possibility of hurting them physically doesn't seem wrong in my head. i dont actually hit/hurt people, thats wrong. i tend not to fight with people either because, as with you, i don't see the point in it, it's immature, petty and pathetic [going to an all girls school i see a lot of this everyday]. the things that happen in early life shape you as a person, and sometimes those negative things creep in and make you just that little bit worse off, it doesn't make you a bad person, it just makes you more aware.
in saying all that though, it kinda would help if i stopped having recurring dreams about standing on pigeons, and crushing fingers *rocks back and forth*
I read a person suggesting that instead ...
I read a person suggesting that instead of totally banning smacking kids, to just ban smacking kids with an object. I think that's an interesting suggestion. Smacking with an object gives the parent a degree of detachment, and also has the potential for inflicting more damage on the hit. Smacking with a hand means that the parent is more aware of what they're doing - they probably end up with a stinging hand too.
Smacking is kinda strange - why do we discipline children by punishing them with physical pain?
//why do we discipline children by ...
//why do we discipline children by punishing them with physical pain?
its easier than inflicting mental pain? not as "permanent"? faster? doesn't take a lot of brain power to do?
//why do we discipline children by ...
//why do we discipline children by punishing them with physical pain?
According to behaviourism there are four ways to make people change their behaviour
positive punishment - behaviour reduced because something is added (e.g., pain -- smacking, making em do extra chores)
negative punishment - behaviour reduced because something is removed (e.g., time-out, grounding, no dessert)
positive reinforcement - behaviour increased because something is added (e.g., extra ice-cream, bribes)
negative reinforcement - behaviour increased because something is removed (e.g., let off doing the dishes)
so why smacking? why pain? if the punishment happens closer to the time of the naughtiness, the more likely it is that the nastiness is associated with what they did bad.
And for the record, I don't support smacking, but I'm not sure that a ban is a good idea either.
Limegreen you poncy liberal, nothing ...
Limegreen you poncy liberal,
nothing like a short sharp smack to make a kid realize what they've done,
Shame, my friend, that's the best way of changing behaviour.
Funny thing is once smacking becomes a taboo youll get those even more crazy enough to believe kids should have identicle rights (but not responsibilities of course) to adults - then where will that leave 99% of the parents out there?
I can't phsically put my hands on you unless in self defence yet what the hell a parent s'posed to do when there toddler flat out refuses to go to bed, get in the car for school..... (as they often will at a certain age). Any physical force could be defined as 'violence' by Lailla Haire and the like.
Kids just aren't little adults, as some would like to believe.
man I sound like a real old closet ...
man I sound like a real old closet conservative freak on that post...
well as i've stated before, my brother ...
well as i've stated before, my brother and i were treated differently according to our personalities...
and personally i found that a telling off was more disturbing to me than a smack, i don't know why...
different children need to be treated differently, i'm not a parent, but just baby sitting for friends i've noted that different kids react better to different treatment... there will be kids that can take a smack and others that can't...
personally the bigger question for me is, when is it too old?
// Limegreen you poncy liberal, You ...
// Limegreen you poncy liberal,
You misread me. I said I don't support smacking, but that doesn't equate to I would never smack a child, and I further said that I'm not sure a ban is a good idea.
it would not be my first choice of punishment, and quite possible my last choice ...
PS - Liberal yes, poncy no.
//personally the bigger question for me ...
//personally the bigger question for me is, when is it too old?
when the child can say the words: "you hit me, i'll hit you"...
//You misread me. I said I don't ...
//You misread me. I said I don't support smacking, but that doesn't equate to I would never smack a child,//
Whoa, talk about fence sitting, I don't think anyone (except inadequate psychos) would regard smacking as anything but a last resort, and using an object or causing real pain is just plain criminal. A smack is more of a physical gesture of disapproval from the parent - and it may be the only thing that kids in a cetain stage where they're testing boundaries etc could understand.
My comment about all parental physical force now becoming 'violence' is real problem - if smacking becaomes criminal then picking up a child against their will could just as easily be described 'assault'.
It's all just a marxist plot to destroy the family and get kids to to rise up against their parents.
(no, forget that.)
// talk about fence sitting I'm fence ...
// talk about fence sitting
I'm fence sitting almost exactly as much as you are...
i don't believe that hitting your ...
i don't believe that hitting your children in any way is acceptable. When my son was about one and two i thought it was the only way that he would learn right from wrong, so he would get a smack on the hand or bottom. It always made me feel like the baddy though cause he would drop his lip and start crying like he was so devastated. Looking back i think a stern 'No' would have made him realise that what he'd done was wrong and with patience from me using 'No' every time would have worked. I put it down to laziness and lack of patience that parents opt for the smack. Now he is three he understands right from wrong if i just tell him, so the only discipline needed is 'time out' because little children hate being locked in a room, and you need to have the patience to keep them in there for at least 5 minutes or until they stop crying. If this is done the right way when a child is very young then discipline when they are older will be easier as long as it is consistently done. Alot of love and company from not just parents but anyone that has role model qualities to the child, i think will significantly help that child to be a 'happy child' and so the nature of the child will be more caring towards other people and harsher disciplining won't be necessary later in life.
don't take this as me been offensive, ...
don't take this as me been offensive, i'm not a parent so i'm not qualified to say you're right or wrong..
is it possible that a child so young does not understand been struck... that maybe a 3 or 4 year old would and there for can be reasoned with and understand.. where as a baby is suddenly just been hurt 'for ne reason' ?
//is it possible that a child so young ...
//is it possible that a child so young does not understand been struck
Hmm. That's where the behaviourist shit comes in. You don't need to *understand*, you just have the unpleasant thing paired with whatever you did. Much like if you get very ill on, say, rum, you end up hating rum. Hence, even an infant can associate a behaviour with pain. Er, that said, a kid that young. not me.
//you just have the unpleasant thing ...
//you just have the unpleasant thing paired with whatever you did
its like when you're training a pet. say you're teaching a dog to sit, some people find that giving a dog a treat or giving the dog complements eg/ 'good dog' when it has done what it was supposed to do is a good way of training it, because they learn that good things come out of it.
the same things work for kids i guess, eg/ "if you eat 3 more pieces of carrot off that plate you can have 5 minutes more play time before your bath".
// the same things work for kids i ...
// the same things work for kids i guess, eg
// "if you eat 3 more pieces of carrot off that plate you can
// have 5 minutes more play time before your bath".
you've just described our nightly dinner routine almost exactly.
Jenni -- you're in welly? yeah? keen for some more babysitting action? ;)
seriously noizy?...
seriously noizy?
yeah, potentially. we've got mates who ...
yeah, potentially. we've got mates who do the job at the moment, but there's the occasional event the 'whole gang' wants to go to, and then it's the wife or me that draws the short straw to stay at home (no grandparents in town to call upon in times of need, dagnabbit).
like I say, nothing in the forseeable future, but it'd be nice to have someone I know I could give a buzz. you'd be up for it?
for sure, email me ...
for sure, email me jenni_punk@herplace.co.nz
May as well throw in my two cents, as ...
May as well throw in my two cents, as one of the few parents lurking on these boards.
I've always thought it was a case-by-case basis. I recall seeing a doco once about some hyper kids that would only calm down and start acting in a remotely responsible manner with a stiff smack from their mum. And it wasn't like she was violent -- it actually upset her a lot more than the kids, in fact -- it was just the only thing they responded to.
So, yes, I think a smack or two is something of a last resort for particularly out-of-control kids. And only a bottom smack (not sure about this smacking the hand business). And I'm always amazed when they talk about the potential law reform and a) it always comes up that some parents smack their kids with spoons or straps or bits of wood, and b) no-one thinks this is in anyway unusual. I personally think that's archaic: "...and after your strapping, it'll be back down the mines for you!".
Naturally, being a softy liberal myself, I vowed never to hit my kids when I had any, and now I have two, I've been able to live up to my word so far (three years into it). I'd have to say though, from experience with friends' kids, and looking back at my own childhood, that I've been lucky enough to have two little sprogglets with incredibly well-adjusted personalities. Milo's yet to get into any serious mischief, and Cosmo, well, yes, he's too busy pondering whatever he ponders to need any sort of discipline yet. I can imagine it'd be a lot different if either of them was a runaway ADD terror like the sort I mentioned in the doco above.
I was smacked growing up as a kid, but only very occasionally, and usually when I'd been quite naughty (fighting with siblings was the main way to get a quick botty-spank, I recall). Didn't do me no harm, as they say, but I reckon my parents would have got the same disciplinary results using a bit of time-out or privileges denial. Probably just lazy, having four kids all aged within four years of each other running around and causing havoc -- a quick smack was a speedier resolution to any trouble than any other option available I suppose. I'm not sure what would get my goat up enough to have me smack one of my kids. It would actually take a systematic series of naughtiness by one of them for which no reasoning or discussion would work out of their system. If Milo decided he was going to maliciously smash a glass on the floor every time he had a drink of milk, for example, and he kept it up for a couple of weeks, I can imagine I'd be getting pretty irate. Although, can't imagine it happening.
The other thing is, if you take a softly softly approach like the wife and I have, the moments you do pull out the heavy firepower, the point is made hard. I very rarely raise my voice to the kids, but on the occasions I have let rip with, for example -- "NO! NEVER push your brother over like that!" -- the effect has been pretty devastating (tears, usually, but also an instant lesson learnt).
So, uh, yes, a typically wishy-washy reply from me. Judge each case on its merits. And if you have to resort to a smack, a quick botty-smack is the best way.
//I can imagine it'd be a lot ...
//I can imagine it'd be a lot different if either of them was a runaway ADD terror
Well, I was one of those, and I marvel every time I think about it that my parents never once struck me. Whenever I got into mischief, and trust me that was pretty often, my parents would simply logic me to death. We would have endless discussions on the ramifications of my actions, even when I was as young as three I remember these... I also recall a more than a few times when they'd sit me down and make me write out pages and pages of complicated extrapolations of the possible future results and global effects of my wrong-doing. I still have a few of these tucked away somewhere. They're hilarious.
My older sister, however, very rarely misbehaved as a child. But nothing motivated her to goodness like the threat of a solid smack on the bum.
Nice. I read something similar......
Nice. I read something similar...
[ external link ]
//The other thing is, if you take a ...
//The other thing is, if you take a softly softly approach like the wife and I have, the moments you do pull out the heavy firepower, the point is made hard.
//Judge each case on its merits
the little kid i babysit, oscar, is three years old and the form of "punishment" you talk about noizy is exactly how his mum and dad deal with him. oscar is a good boy, and will generally do most things you ask him to do without much convincing, but there are times where he just wont do anything you say no matter how many times you ask him to do it.
i have seen jane [his mother] practically pull her hair out because of this disobediance, but i have never seen her hit him. if oscar has got to the point where he will do nothing you say, he is given a firm warning, if he still doesnt do what you want him to do, jane will walk him to his room and shut the door. it doesn't seem like much punishment, but it is a last resort and to oscar this is tough, he learns his lesson right away [tear usually follow] and generally won't do what ever he has done again.
Nicely done noizy. Somehow I'm not ...
Nicely done noizy. Somehow I'm not surprised that your kids are pretty well behaved ...
hmmm....pardon my hippieness but ...
hmmm....pardon my hippieness but violence does not solve violence.
but the point being the occasional smack around the bum or hand does not work, it makes it worse - just read my story for the facts.
[ external link ]
The best punishment procedure I ever ...
The best punishment procedure I ever heard about was a friend of mine who said that her parents believed in smacking, but they would never hit their kids while they were still angry. If any of the kids did anything really naughty, they'd be sent to their room while the parents calmed down, had a cup of tea, and worked out what discipline they were going to administer. The kids hardly ever got smacked, when they did it wasn't way out of proportion to the crime, and having to wait around for the verdict was the most effective punishment of all.
Smacking never has, doesnt and will not ...
Smacking never has, doesnt and will not ever work, it does not make children better behaved rather it effects them in later years, i know of this first hand as i was brought up in a strict roman catholic family (although these days my dad seldomly goes to church), the smackings continued till when i began high school and since then i have learned to hate the roman catholic system. (no offence to catholics out there) and years later ive paid the price, rather than being "in the prime of life" im battling depression and a nicotine addiction. im highly defiant and hostile towards not only authority but towards other people my age (preps, slappers, ravers - youd all know by now) im completely withdrawn from society. all because of my upbringing. Psychologically this has effected me many many years later but has taught me that by the time i become a father not to punish my kids with smackings, it'll always be "time out" and lectures as well as 30 minutes of hard labour plus loss of privliges for a certain period of time (say a week)
[ external link ]
//not to punish my kids with smackings, ...
//not to punish my kids with smackings, it'll always be "time out" and lectures as well as 30 minutes of hard labour plus loss of privliges for a certain period of time (say a week)
ba ha ha ha, thats almost exactly what my dad does to me now, except its "if you don't clean your room by friday 10pm, i'm not giving you a lift to work on saturday morning"....followed by a lecture about how "my room is a "biohazard" which is probably infested with rats and if it was to be set on fire it would probably explode"....which is followed by a "fuck off" from me. ahhhh i love my dad.
// violence does not solve ...
// violence does not solve violence.
agree with you there. But I think what I was getting at with my post above was that in some cases, a smack is the *only* way some parents can get their kids to behave. Obviously, in 99.99999% of the cases, smacking isn't required, and, by the sounds of your upbringing, you'd fall well into the category of kids who didn't 'deserve' to be smacked.
The obvious solution to kids who are so out-of-control that they need a whack to calm them down is another drastic solution: drugs. I'm not sure which way I waver on that. The USA has obviously given us an example of how mis-diagnosis can lead to a virtual mass doping of young kids under the auspices of correcting 'behavioural problems'. As has been argued elsewhere, how much of those problems are just down to (ahem, I really hate these words) 'bad parenting' as opposed to actual, real psychological problems is anyone's guess. I'd be on the side of the argument that says a lot of that ritalin is going into kids that really just need some parental discipline. And not specifically smacking. I'd still go with my theory that virtually *all* kids can be taught to behave through the non-violent techniques, but that there's a very very small minority that need something more. And whether that's the occasional smack, or a pill, is really up to the parent. Or, like velocity's example, you could just guts it out as a parent, put up a child who refuses or doesn't respond to non-violent discipline, and hope it all turns out ok after 10-20 years of (presumably hellish) home life.
sorry, last sentence... "...put up ...
sorry, last sentence...
"...put up [with] a child..."
I hate how churches do that to ...
I hate how churches do that to families. I'm in south Auckland and we have a ridiculous amount of churches in this area that has a negative stranglehold on the poorer comunity. There is a hate that is generated from younger people here who are disciplined for openly questioning their church. Its like that old Japanese saying "Every nail that sticks up, must be hammered down".
I was about to say that people who were ...
I was about to say that people who were smacked usually say smacking is alright as a result, while people who were never smacked always say that it is wrong. Which I find really annoying - but Lucifer Sam's gutsy post has (and I'm glad) thrown a bit of a spanner in the works there.
One thing I would like to offer my two cents on though is the right of a parent who smacks to offer their opinion on smacking. At my old work we had a big argument one day about smacking. These two parents, one female, one male (not together) told me I could not comment because I had no children and therefore no perspective. They felt smacking was necessary and fine. I asked them whether they were smacked as children and whether they smacked their own kids now. They (finally) admitted that "yes" that was true. I then suggested that perhaps they agreed with smacking because to think otherwise would be to denounce the way they were raised, to express resentment and/or regret at their parents and the methods they used to raise them, and that no one likes to admit the way they have been living their life is wrong because we only have one (life) and we like to validate what we do as a self-defence mechanism. I then made them angry (a good thing, I reckon) because I told them I had much more perspective than them because I had not yet limited my self-assessment nor narrowed my insight by hitting my non-existent children - I still have the option.....they do not.
My point is that I don't think parents who smack their kids should be able to vote on whether or not parents should smack their kids. What do you all reckon?
Incidentally, I was hit as a child and teen by my stepfather and it doesn't do any good at all. Unless wanting to rid planet earth of them is positive. Certainly, I would NEVER want to hit my children, but I know now that there is a part of me unable to independently make that decision. I will just have to really try my hardest and all because of someone else's weakness.
//I will just have to really try my ...
//I will just have to really try my hardest and all because of someone else's weakness.
Which is a much better (and more difficult) option than just perpetuating what you're given. Too many people blame their own inability to change on their parents' inability to change. They say, "A good smack never did me any harm, why should I treat my kids any differently?"
People also used to think that bathing caused disease, but we learned that was wrong eventually too.