I had a conversation yesterday with a clever venue owner and part of the discussion got onto the topic of the live scene.
We both felt that there was not really enough opportunities for new bands to be 'blooded' on the live circuit. With a noticable return to favour for live performance music, the bands that are playing headlining gigs did not seem to be as outstanding as local bands were a few years ago. The bands that have taken the place of the "big" bands that have moved, seem to be not quite reaching the same standards.
We wondered why this was? Are bands not learning enough because the big bands move away too quickly to pass on the skills? Are standards dropping in general? And how will the current standards effect the new generation of musicians and bands?
There also seems to be less opportunities for bands coming through to play smaller venues and learn the craft.
Any thoughts on this?


Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Technorati
Good point dust. The only way bands ...
Good point dust.
The only way bands can "learn the craft" of playing live is by doing it. Over and over again. This is up to the bands and not the venues. Theoretically, the more you play live and get your name out, the more you can attract the punters. From there it follows that it is easier to get gigs at bigger and better places. It is important for bands to go through the whole demoralisation of "crap gigs where everything went wrong", so that they learn how to avoid these kind of situations and gain that extra bit of professionalism as a result of these horrible experiences.
I certainly believe that there are no less opportunities to play live now than there were a few years ago. In fact, judging by your comments on how the standard of live shows has dropped, I would think it's easier for unknown/inexperienced bands to get gigs.
This is lucky because my new band is about to gig soon, although we're no strangers to playing live. I expect many crap-thursday-night-gigs-to-fuck-all-people, but it has to be done, I s'pose.
to the casual observer i see it like ...
to the casual observer i see it like this:
a lot of bands are having to fund their own ep releases and the like without support of some sort of label. back in the day shihad had the support of wildside so getting nationwide distribution wasn't the problem it is for some bands today. airplay is usually a by-prodcut of distribution and marketing. without nationwide distribution it is difficult for word of mouth to spread so the opportunity for bands to play in centres other than their own diminishes. thus, bands are limited to playing their home town more often than not because few people will know who the band are in other centres. and you can't play that often in your home town otherwise you'll over-saturate yourselves on the punters.
i think bands only learn to play live by playing live. sounds simple, but owing to the above, this may be a why it's a harder craft to extract.
There are WAY more indie labels that ...
There are WAY more indie labels that are looking for bands these days. The internet has made it infinately easier to hook up with bands in other centres to organise tours etc. it's up to the band to get their shit together and get out there. Labels will only come knocking if they feel a band is good enough, if the band even wants to sign with a label (and a lot of bands opt not to).
Shihad was not the only NZ band in the early nineties. They didn't have label support from the word go, they made it happen through hard work and perseverence.
PS: I said "Shihad" and not "Pacifier". Don't even get me started on this monstrosity.
//i think bands only learn to play live by playing live.
You're dead right. I would argue that it's no harder these days, in fact it's a lot easier.
I agree tclak. Put that way I think ...
I agree tclak. Put that way I think there are more opportunities these days.
If there are more, I wonder why the standards of performance are not better or equal at least? Do you think standards are not as good? tclak, Vietnow?
I would agree that the standard has ...
I would agree that the standard has dropped, possibly because it IS easier to get gigs and so bands don't have to have their shit together so well to get gigs.
I've been to a few gigs with the whole "garage rock" vibe and been mortified at some of the munters on stage. At a gig late last year the main singer/guitarist in one of the bands (I think up from Palmy - it was the "Rock n' Roll is my only Salvation" gig) was so shitfaced that he took about six songs to tune his guitar. The other guitarist/singer did the set without him and was fine. When the "showman" finally felt he was ready to join his band, he was tuned to a level that was completely (I couldn't believe a guitar could be tuned so incompetantly) out with the other guitarist. I won't even talk about his singing and even more deplorable banter.
It wasn't very rock n' roll either.
The rest of the band was good though, as were most of the other bands that night. I wasn't exactly blown away, though.
perhaps it is misplaced encouragement. ...
perhaps it is misplaced encouragement. Instead of saying "you guys have potential but you need to work on this, this and this" people/friends are saying "yeah you are great, go you good local music thing".
personally I blame the lack of great international acts coming through and inspiring those to do better to set a goal to aim for. I really wish all NZ bands had checked out Seafood when they played Bodega in Wellington. Fuck all people and they still gave it everything.
//perhaps it is misplaced ...
//perhaps it is misplaced encouragement
Now THAT is a point worth thinking about.
I went to compilation release gig a ...
I went to compilation release gig a week or so back, and was repeatedly struck with the same though..... the gig was good ish the music was not bad, but each and every time what ever band was on stage the song that they introduced as "this is the one on the cd"was so much tighter, cleaner, and all in all a notch above the other things they had done, and at the time I thought this would be an interesting topic........ should bands workshop their music more as opposed to just practicing and gigging it? Stefen's "you guys have potential but you need to work on this, this and this...." comment hold alot of water
//I blame the lack of great ... acts coming through and inspiring, ...agree and expand... What I also have seen of late is the bands that have gigged with more "mature and sessioned bands" seem to have rasied their standard.... Betachbupa is a prime example of this, they were always great on stage but now after touring with some major Names they are bloody gobsmaking.
so do bands need to go through an Apprenticeship????
//so do bands need to go through an ...
//so do bands need to go through an Apprenticeship????
Absolutely. Without question (and that is not a bad thing, either). Going on from what Stefan said - the "misplaced encouragement" topic - Bands need criticism to hone their craft. It is vital. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger - cliche, I know but it rings true in so many ways.
People who are about to attack this by saying "I don't give a fuck what other people think about MY music" are only fooling themselves and are probably hopeless amateurs as a result.
// Shihad was not the only NZ band in ...
// Shihad was not the only NZ band in the early nineties.
yeah, first one who comes to mind. straightjacket, hlah, bailterspace, headless chickens etc etc.
// Do you think standards are not as good? tclak, Vietnow?
it's hard for me to tell. i'm in my early twenties and i didn't start gigging until i was about 15. i'm not sure, but i've seen bands such as dimmer, pluto and the shining path in the last few months and they're were as good as anything i saw back in the day. i guess maybe cuz there's more gigs the great ones kinda all merge into the other gigs.
// There are WAY more indie labels that ...
// There are WAY more indie labels that are looking for bands these days.
i've thought a little more about this, and you're obviously right, but the industry (by this i mean the media, major labels etc) are focused on your shihads, your zeds, your bic rungas, your stellars. if they distributed their resources more evenly other bands would force their way into more peoples conciousness and raise the level of people they reach.
i guess my thesis is bands aren't playing enough gigs. and more often than not, the industry dictates this rather than desire, talent or quality.
//but the industry (by this i mean the ...
//but the industry (by this i mean the media, major labels etc) are focused on your shihads, your zeds, your bic rungas, your stellars.
And what about Kog, Arch Hill, LOOP, Midium, Round Trip Mars (as well as many others)? I would say that Indie labels in NZ are flourishing and each of these labels put on gigs to a very high standard. There should just be more of them!
I also wanted to add that when I say ...
I also wanted to add that when I say "standards have dropped" it's thats standards overall have changed from 'really mindblowing' to 'pretty good all things considered'.
And thats a huge generalisation so there are many many exceptions along the way.
I think one of the missing ingredients ...
I think one of the missing ingredients is competition. There used to be bands that played together regularly and they would set out to kick each other's arses on stage every night. The bar was raised every performance. With the local bands there doesn't seem to be that sense of healthy rivallry (in regards to live performance). This may be a factor of rebuilding the 'scene' (someone please find me a better word!). Over the last couple of years it was just great to see a live band, great to see your friends get a gig and you were stoked if they half filled the room. Now the live music scene is up and on it's way, we've all seen the same bands play a couple or more times and it's time to up the ante - now it's time to quit with the back patting and just kick it to hell.
And by kick it I mean that I want to see bands giving it so much they bleed, they passout or they throw up. I want to forget where I am, or what I'm drinking, I want the bar to be silenced because the guy on stage has just torn his heart out of his chest and is holding it aloft for our inspection. And above all I want to feel that these bands really really believe in their music.
Exactly. Bring it on ! ! !...
Exactly. Bring it on ! ! !
// I want the bar to be silenced ...
// I want the bar to be silenced because the guy on stage has just torn his heart out of his chest and is holding it aloft for our inspection.
I wonder about this statement or whether its a function of us having a few years and gigs under our belts that we don't find it happening. I certainly remember bands doing this, with absolutely heart-ringing performances - notably Straightjacket fits (and the Double Happies before that), the 3D's and Headless Chickens. Younger people are finding that with new bands coming through - I think the Blindspott forum is a perfect illustration of this - their fans obviously find all the intensity in that band that I found in the bands when I was being exposed to them for the first few years. There are still some who do it for me, make me totally lose myself - I've written before about Paselode and how I could dance or listen but not both at the same time, and there are others.
I dunno if yr in a band or not, but I ...
I dunno if yr in a band or not, but I know that the band I'm in (vocoder), and a lot of the bands we've played with in the past 2 years or so sweat blood every time they step on stage. It means that much (at least to me). If that doesn't translate to the punters, then so be it
Luv an' punkrawk
[ http://www.vocoder.co.nz ]
What is it that actually makes a good ...
What is it that actually makes a good performance anyway? Noone can deny that The Datsuns really have it together, but there are bands I know who are scratching their heads trying and working out why they aren't connecting with the audience. They make great music in the studio, but when they play live, they don't quite gel.
I spoke to the manager of the Offbeats on Saturday and he was horror-struck that I was mildly critical. Later on I thought hard about what I'd said, and realised that although I didn't think they were as tight as the other bands, they had a fantastic reception, and in light of the massive crowd going mental up the front, my criticisms were, if not wrong, just irrelevant.
// there are bands I know who are ...
// there are bands I know who are scratching their heads trying and working out why they aren't connecting with the audience
I'm really interested in this point. I know there are lots of bands reading this forum. I wonder if we could give them some detailed feedback from our POV?
The other comments are really interesting also, but I'd love to see us collectively write something here that the bands actually can assimilate into their day today and take to practice and make March a killer month!!! or July and November etc etc!
//my criticisms were, if not wrong, ...
//my criticisms were, if not wrong, just irrelevant.
Your criticism cannot be wrong! Criticism is opinion based and so will be different from person to person. If the band thinks about what you say, they can decide if it has some weight, if they think so, they will practise harder and be tighter next time.
That is the beauty of criticism.
In an interview yesterday we heard a ...
In an interview yesterday we heard a description of a frontman - he was great because he really believed in his music and therefore 'sold' it to the audience with venom and passion, and heres the important bit, EVERY NIGHT he played!
//they can decide if it has some ...
//they can decide if it has some weight, if they think so, they will practise harder and be tighter next time
Actually, that was something that struck me - the guy to whom I spoke had asked my opinion, but took my comments *extremely* personally, and spent a good while telling me about all the great reviews they'd gotten. It left me wondering about the role of managers, and how some people get into management without knowing exactly how much their job entails. I'd imagine that managers should be the first of a band's critics.
//I'd love to see us collectively ...
//I'd love to see us collectively write something here
Perhaps it'd go down well in a new "Reality Behind The Music" weblog, hmmm?
// It left me wondering about the role ...
// It left me wondering about the role of managers, and how some people get into management without knowing exactly how much their job entails.
The old "yes men" dilemma. You create a world in which everything is dandy and when people point out something you dismiss it as "uninformed". As tclak said criticism shouldn't be totally ignored no matter who the source may be.
some detailed feedback IMHO Too many ...
some detailed feedback IMHO
Too many times I have been to gigs and come away thinking that I might as seen this on the telly, for all the excitement I got.
Strangely enough only last night in chat we had a brief discussion on performer / audience exchange and this then spilt over to our dinner table.
I flippantly said the audiences are like vampires, we only come out at night and we feed from the energy of the bands we are seeing...... Teina's comments about wanting to see blood only confirm this idea.
1) I don't care about "rock star " posses or the way you stand, I care greatly about your music and sometimes on stage shenanigans can totally distract from that.
2) If your music is strong in lyric content for god sake make sure that the guys on the desk know that your vocals need to be mixed with out distortion
3) start on time, I got my shit together enough to be there when your poster said you were starting, it's only good manners.
4) don't spend too much time trying to engage me with banter, let your music impress ( I know I am always on this soapbox ..oops but dust did ask)
5) I know that you can not see me through the glare of the lights but this does not mean you should forget that I am there. The odd grin cast my way will make me forgive alot of technical mistakes
6) talking of grinning, private jokes on stage with other band members make me feel left out
7) pack a 1st aid kit for your instrument....... for god's sake strings break
8) it takes a lot of courage to come and shake your hand and say thank after a gig, please don't blow me off......... actually this has only happened to me once but it has left a long-standing bitter taste in my mouth.
9) look like you believe in what you are doing, a bit of bluff and bullshit can go a long way :)
10) Oh and if you are one of the "I don't give a fuck what other people think about MY music" please tell me before I waste my money and my time
hey but what the fuck do I know, I only get out a couple of times a month
Nice points raised there aka. I ...
Nice points raised there aka. I especially agree with the first aid kit one. The amount of times i've had to wait around at a gig while someone goes out to get some strings is unbelievable!
11) Don't answer cellphone mid set. ...
11) Don't answer cellphone mid set. coughphoenixrisingcough.
[ http://www.rottonpear.tk ]
One problem with Aka's list is that ...
One problem with Aka's list is that not all members will have the same list. I for one don't need the band to be grinning at me, don't need the banter, to have a good night - I think I've been to Jacob gigs, in fact I'm sure it was Jacob @ Valve, where they've had their backs oturned to us and hardly said a word all night, yet the music has been so _there_ that it never mattered. I do agree, however, that if you're going to engage in any kind of banter, that it has to actually work - there's nothing worse than a front person to be yakking away about crap that no-one finds the least bit interesting or intelligible: if you can't make the between song stuff hold us, stick to the songs.
Sometimes, the pose is important - bands like the Datsuns, the D4 and Two Lane Blacktop all make use of poses to great effect: others make us cringe at their discomfort. One thing I would really recommend is to get a video camera and just watch your own performance - it is something that I had to do myself as part of my training to do court work, and it is so important in revealing things that are going to be distracting or annoying. Any performer will benefit from seeing their own performance, I think.
Of course, the big element is the music itself, that has to be done right.
//One problem with Aka's list is that ...
//One problem with Aka's list is that not all members will have the same list.
What????? I don't speak for the all members???? omg why didn't someone tell me this before now???
Aka gets down of her high horse, and makes a quilt.
//I spoke to the manager of the ...
//I spoke to the manager of the Offbeats on Saturday
laff. what eactly did you say to the guy for him to be that taken back by it?
I said I didn't like them as much as ...
I said I didn't like them as much as the other bands, mainly because of my own personal taste, and also I thought during a couple of the faster tunes at the beginning of the set, some of the band sounded like they were having problems keeping in time; but they improved as the set progressed.
So nothing too serious. He totally overreacted. I just mentioned it because I think that the way managers approach their job can potentially have a really positive effect on a band's performance. As Stefan mentioned, it's the yes-man dilemma. Your music may be fine, but if your manager is just strolling around picking people out of the crowd to tell you how great you are, then you're never going to get any better. I suspect quite a few bands end up with one of their salesman mates as a manager - lots of enthusiasm, sufficient organisational skills, very little critical expertise.
...although my original point was that ...
...although my original point was that whether or not a performance impresses you has a lot with your own personal taste in music as well.
// has a lot with your own personal ...
// has a lot with your own personal taste
has a lot to do with your own personal taste.
so much for splitting infinitives, I just left one out completely.
our manager is our tennor sax... WE are ...
our manager is our tennor sax... WE are HIS yes-men :P
Good work dust! This is a really ...
Good work dust! This is a really interesting topic . . .
Good points all round and thanks to aka ...
Good points all round and thanks to aka for the tips. Just to summarise from some bits above, I think the equation for good live gigs is pretty simple: lots of practice, lots of live gigs to no one, be polished on stage, and give plenty of respect to anyone that takes their time and money to turn up to your gig!
Just one quick thing to add - our band is about to release our debut album and do some gigging in other towns. What we really want to do is hook up with some bands in other towns that want to play when we are in town and then when they come to Auckland we can return the favour. It would be great if bands in different towns could work together like this. Maybe its a pipe dream, but I'll let you know how we get on.
//our band is about to release our ...
//our band is about to release our debut album
what band's that then?
can hook you up with a gig in dunedin. ...
can hook you up with a gig in dunedin. email:mikedogmc@hotmail.com. my band is alpha cast - 3 piece. look forward to hearing from you.
There is another element that's ...
There is another element that's unquantifiable. I went to a Deluxeboy gig over the summer, I've heard and liked a couple of their songs on CD, they've obviously been perfoming together for a while, were polished and yet their show fell flat - they couldn't entice people in close, no-one would dance, there was something missing. Maybe going to watch bands that _don't_ work as a band is also good learning, if you can work out what it is that isn't there.
One thing that doesn't seem to be a problem so much these days is the lack of vocals that seemed to typify gigs in the '80s - we'd see the vocalist hammering away but the mix was so bad that there was no way to hear whet was being sung. Having the balance between the band components right is essential.
Ive just been informed of the politics ...
Ive just been informed of the politics of Forums and how you're not supposed to advertise your band etcetcetc. So I apologise in advance for offending anyone, but seeing as Heather asked:
We're called Leonard
Say no more, how about get someone else ...
Say no more, how about get someone else to advertise you? Like ummmmm I don't know
*COUGH* Leonard - named after the practice room beer fridge and just as cool! The Auckland based 5 piece follow up their debut single Paul Weller, which caught the ear of student radio and Channel Z programmers in Auckland and featured on Kiwi Hit Disc 36, with another upbeat popgem. In between day jobs, the band recorded a new 4 track EP at York St studios mastered by Delta's Andrew Buckton. *COUGH*
So by the way where have you guys been hiding for the last couple of years?
All NZ bands should promote the hell ...
All NZ bands should promote the hell outta themselves here. Who told you not to?!!
I didn't read it as shameless ...
I didn't read it as shameless self-promotion or nowt; and I'm sure there'd be no problem with you posting a classified for bands to gig with...
But back to the topic, I think most ...
But back to the topic, I think most bands when they first start playing live they aren't as tight and refined as their latest performances sometimes mainly due to being nervous and stressed. When your adjitated its harder to enjoy yourself and keep with the others sometimes. But once you can relax thats when you start mastering the live performance. Just my opinion though.
Yeah, a coupla people I know who have ...
Yeah, a coupla people I know who have been playing for years still get all uptight before gigs. I reckon if they played to an audience a lot more regularly, it'd get a lot less stressful.
I have found a cure for perfomance ...
I have found a cure for perfomance anxiety!! Well kinda *blush*. This might be impersonal but if you try to pretend the audience aren't there and go as your playing in your bedroom it works! I know first-hand, don't ask i just know :)
Actually, I was thinking before about ...
Actually, I was thinking before about how bands could do the opposite - invite friends to as many of their practices as is practicable, and treat them like gigs. You get your confidence playing in front of people (people that you know won't rip your still-beating heart from your chest and slam-dunk it into an empty beer glass); it'd be easier learning how to connect with an audience that you already know, and it's far less of a big step when you do play in public.
No way. Band practises shouldn't be ...
No way. Band practises shouldn't be treated as a free live show. In the past in my wannabe rockstar years people use to always come to our practices but it seemed more intimidating than an incentive. Band practise is like a sanctuary for the band and the band only, anyone else that is a non-factor just is a liability.
Yeah, I understand that, but I think ...
Yeah, I understand that, but I think once you've got a set together it may benefit the band to try it out in front of a bunch of people. Rather than facing a public audience cold (and all the organisation & money that requires), I think it'd be worth going through the set a few times with a few mates just to get confidence and a bit of audience feedback. It's the "intimidating" thing you're trying to combat, after all.
I'd see it as the same as previewing a movie for a test audience.
exactly, thats what my band does after ...
exactly, thats what my band does
after writing a few new songs we get people over to give "possitive" feedback