DEFINE

Ok I just saw Betchadupa getting called alternative rock.
What is alternative rock to you?
I want to know.

Is it Betchadupa? HDU? the Datsuns? or is it Tadpole?

Or shut the fuck up andrew its all ROCK MAN!!!!!!!!!

Forums: NZ Music,

I knew i should have got more sleep before i said that!

No man i've heard it else where as well. Nothing wrong with saying what you've probably already heard.

but yeah......funny huh

yeah haha Besides I don't really put much thought into Betchadupa

On bands.co.nz Betchadupa are described as "guitar angst" thats even funnier!!!

fuck crazy. What on earth would Liam Finn have to be angsty about?

umm don't quote me on this but i heard he had a 10pm curfew

// Besides I don't really put much thought into Betchadupa

So there are others out there :)

yes there are millions

//i heard he had a 10pm curfew

Can't be, I've seen him playing at midnight.
I wouldn't call them alternative. Maybe rock/pop.

i wouldn't exactly call them pop or rock/pop. i'd say they were more melodic modern rock. but to me they just sound like "NZ Rock" as if that were a genre

Betchadupa to me sound like very very tight pop rock.

Well i think alternative rock is rock but more experimental and bridging the gaps with new ideas from different styles.

//Is it Betchadupa? HDU? the Datsuns? or is it Tadpole?

It would be Tadpole. HDU is sonic noise rock, Betchadupa is who the fuck cares anyway, and The Datsuns are old school rock.

No dude youve got it all wrong here.
I wasn't askin out of those bands. haha.

I put tadpole in as a joke. Wouldn't you say Tadpole are like nu metal rock?

//Wouldn't you say Tadpole are like nu metal rock?

sometimes and sometimes not its too hard to tell sometimes

tadpole are hard to classify, id say heavy rock with "guitar angst"llol :P

To be honest i call Tadpole alternative, I know alot of people will disagree with me on this but i think Tadpole offer far too much as in music wise to be anything associated with nu-metal. And besides Renee can sing better than any nu-metal band.

i can't stand it anymore!!!!

if i can make some wild generalisations and stabs at influences :

Tadpole got it from Garbage.

Garbage got it from Curve (who i WORSHIP)

Curve got it from Siousie Sioux

there the trail goes cold for me.

loud effects laden guitars, pile on more effects, and then even more effects and compressors on top of that, like a tank falling down a cliff (ala Indiana Jones), and top off with an angelic/angst/angry/ennui-laden female voice.

i'm sure My Bloody Valentine fit in there somewhere ... kinda contemporary with Curve. but that sort of bloodline/heritage, for me anyway, don't make Tadpole sound at all alt.

mmmmmmmmmmmmy bloody valentine.
mmmmmmmmmmmmmm curve

cleanie maybe we should get married. Well after you break up with your partner.

Anyway......sorry

Tadpole to me is just shite so there haha

subtle andoru, subtle

butch found some curve records and butchered them to create the garbage that is garbage

i didnt think that alternative got used anymore. wasnt it a catch phrase to descripe bands in the post GnR pre Nirvana era? or any band that is not classic rock? yeah alternative is fucked. :)

//post GnR pre Nirvana era?

that would have been the term "grunge"

Yeah, 'alternative' is a minefield. It has unfortunately been linked to the term 'wankers'.

When bands were first earning the label of 'alternative', (now, this was 10 years ago or so in America, so I may be way off as to how it applies right now in New Zealand) it struck me that the music being called alternative was just derivative of the _really_ interesting stuff going on at the time, diluted heavily so that the masses could enjoy it as well.

Come to think of it, that's what Tadpole sounds like to me, too.

alternative was pretty much a 90s thing, but it still stands.

I think of the Smashing Pumpkins as alternative rock
but think all this genre names are stupid anyway

alternative's a pretty subjective thing, but for me it's whatever surprises me a little. you go along, expecting to see something, and expectations get blown out of the water.

i guess the thing with betchadupa is that they're young and still naturally wearing their influences on their sleeves, till they find their own way. live, they're pretty damn good and really do range into new areas (though i've only seen them twice and lust after the guitarist).

but yeah, in the past "alt" has been used as a convenient marketing/genre classification. i remember summers down by the river early 90s wading thru my friends's tapes in their orange datsun ... dinosaur jr, sonic youth, nirvana, porno for pyros, sebadoh and a million other now forgotten bands. they were alt to me then, but times change.

hope i make sense. i'm still at work writing grammatically incorrect sentences for a living ...

are you tutorin 127? is your effectiveness decreasing?

LOL! effectiveness! one more nom and i'll go over the edge!

nah, not 127. things aren't that bad yet. though the course co-ordinator rocks. i'm just a gunslinging Blackboard-taming data entry grammarian freelancer. might end up doing some 127 at some stage this year though ... sell them my sentences ... are you a survivor? i took 124 myself many moons ago, but not 127.

afterthought ... limegreen you need to trim those redundancies. and i need to work on my concision ... it would be good to edit posts after they're posted ... i have so many "spirit of the stairs" afterthoughts as soon as i click add comment ...

i did hmmmm 125 (nz lit) in 7 odd years ago.

my writing has never been sanitised. even an advanced does of how to write like a retard (psyc202) hasn't stunted my drivel...

back in the day when they actually had blackboards in lecture theatres, not on the net...

//but for me it's whatever surprises me a little. you go along, expecting to see something, and expectations get blown out of the water.

I agree. The last time this happened to me was when I saw Orkid for the first time. They would definitely be included in my vague definition of alt.

genres are fairly unreliable at the best of times...

but i think of alternative as a 90s thing, and many of the the bands iluvtheclean mentions...
part of the problem with them is that they are fuzzy entities, and easiest to use when applied retrospectively. Back in the day Green Day, Korn and Rage were all labelled alternative, but now i've heard people call Green Day punk rock, and Korn are fathers of one of the genres (nu metal or something). They're just labels, and ultimately only vaguely useful, and probably slightly less usefull and intelligible than the ones librarians use.

As a result, I'd suggest that labelling the datsuns is a bit premature. It'll only be after we see what comes after them (in 10 years time) that it will very obvious. And even then it'll be pretty arbitrary.

//but now i've heard people call Green Day punk rock

that's funny, i've heard people call them that since the 90s. Their style is rooted in The Buzzcocks style of punk so i wouldn't say they were alternative. but every since their latest album they ar now.

Greenday used to be punk. When I was young and punk, and used to hang out with them, they were punk as fuck. Over the years, though, they just got old and lazy. There's no way they're punk now. They haven't been for at least ten years.

yes true they have departed from punk

Billy Joe just got arrested for being drunk in a convertable BMX now thats punk.

ermmmmmm not.

// a convertable BMX

i always wanted one of those when i was a kid.....my BMX was the only one with a roof.

Sorry my bad. bmw

i was kind of thinking about 94-ish. when they used to play ACDC on ZM (The Rock of the 90s).

alternative (noun) 1. a possibility of choice, esp between two things. 2. either of such choices. (adj) 3 presenting a choice, esp between two possibilities only. 4. (of two things) mutually exclusive. 5. denoting a lifestyle, culture, art form, etc. that is regarded as preferable to that of contemporary society because it is less conventional, materialistic or institutionalized.

Collins Concise Dictionary 21st Century Edition.

I guess in the context of this discussion the final definition is that which would most closely fit most peoples idea of what alternative rock is. But for me I just get confused. There are so many genres (alternatives) and, within them, sub-genres that I just get lost.

I cast my mind back to the dim, dark past and the late 1970's early 1980's. Listenting to Barry Jenkin late at night on Radio Hauraki ... and these fresh sounds, ground-breaking stuff ... PUNK rock. Angry, aggressive music ... an alternative to the big rock of the time.

Further back to the 60's (yep I'm that old) and this bright and breezy music from this band of long haired pommy lay-abouts (my dad's description) with the misspelt name. Music that really captured the imagination of young people around the world. The music of The Beatles (another "the" band) was an alternative to the buttoned down stuff of our parents generation. And around the same time another alternative in the form of The Rolling Stones ... a moodier attititude and even longer hair.

So really for me the term alternative in relation to genres of music is as much related to the time as the music itself. A bit like the term "pop". In it's original meaning it was simply a contraction of popular ... so pop music was the popular music of the day ... the stuff that "the people" listened to on the radio. As opposed to getting dressed up in black tie and attending a performance of the LSO. These days "pop" is often used to denigrate music that is seen as too commericial though in the broader sense it covers a huge range of genre ... Top of the Pops clearly demonstrates this with a wide range of genre represented on it over time. (Even if a lot if it is utter crap, IMHO)

Even the term "rock" is another made-up label. Used to describe music that was harder, edgier than the pop of the day. And in itself lifted from the term rock 'n' 'roll. Another genre with its' roots in black american music. Rock 'n' Roll was a descriptive term and a euphimism for sex. So R'n'R was music about (and for?) sex. No wonder white america wanted to ban it.

But Rock is just another made-up label ... like Metal, Heavy Metal, Alt Rock, Grunge, Indie, Power Pop .. the list goes on. And the labels can confuse ... The D4 have been described to me as Rock 'n' Roll ... and I guess in a sense they are. The music is pretty straight 1,2,3,4 goodtime balls out stuff. But to my ear there is a real punk senisibility to their sound, and as a group they certainly tip their hat to some powerful punk influences.

I know this is a bit of a ramble, but my point, and I do have one, is that in the literal sense a lot of "rock" is alternative, ie preferable ... because it is less conventional, ... different in fact.

Perhaps we should be less quick to label music and pop it into nice little compartments. Rather just let the music move you as it will ... too often we use the label to denigrate something we don't particularly like ... or that which we don't understand.

isnt it music?
any attempt to put music in a box will fail
because you didnt create the noise
when you do you can call it what ever you want
other wise your opinion is just that.

Wow, someone's cranky today...

yeah shut the andrew it is all music!!!!!
can i get an amen?

"hey, I've heard this really great band."
"wow, what kind of band?"
"they play music."
"yeah, but what kind?"
"well, ummm, well, it's music."
"yeah, but am I going to like it?"
"of course, don't you like music??"
"not all of it."
"what do you mean? it's all just music isn't it?"
"surely you can't be serious..."

But given the difficulty there seems to be in defining "alternative" whatever label you assign to this great band is liable to confuse. Your point is well made, though; there is a definite need to have some shorthand way of describing the music we listen to.

I think that we just need to avoid too many labels. Some are obvious; reggae springs to mind. But then there are all the variants that spring from the same source. It just gets so damn confusing. I get lost and maybe end up missing out on something I might enjoy.

And I hate to see it when labels are used to denigrate anything ... that is just soooo gay (heavy irony intended) I like lots of different stuff .... though I am inclined to prefer rock and jazz. And yes those are two very broad genre ... which is my point I think. Lets not get too hung up and try to pigeon-hole the music too much ...

If we need to describe the music there are plenty of old fashioned adjectives available that can be used to give an idea of what to expect ... loud, fast, melodic, raw ...

And whatever happened to Acid Rock!!!???

//I get lost and maybe end up missing out on something I might enjoy
Agreed.
//And I hate to see it when labels are used to denigrate anything
Agreed.
//If we need to describe the music there are plenty of old fashioned adjectives available that can be used to give an idea of what to expect ... loud, fast, melodic, raw ...
Probably the smartest comment I've seen on this thread yet, and definitely one I need to take on board.

I just get a bit tired of the whole cop-out "it's all just music." If people can't be bothered finding a plausible reason for disliking labels, then they shouldn't bother participating in the discussion.

I think the thing that mainly appeals to me about labels is just how brilliantly original and descriptive some of the names are. I love words like "acid" and "grunge" and "trip-hop", and I also like making up my own labels for the bands that I listen to. On my Windows Media player, I've got "Jazz/Bluegrass Fusion" for Beck, "Placid House" for Moby, "Folk-A-Dolk" for Bressa Creeting Cake, and Aphex Twin is filed under "Indescribable".

Anything with the prefix "nu" is out! I could possibly live with "new-metal."

I agree, Big_Stu... as I have said before - the 'Nu' thing must die.

Agreed. Maybe there should be a statute of limitations on labels so we can ditch the dull ones when they become too generic.