The new Labour/Prog. Coalition/United Fascist coalition is one fucked up choice aunty helen has made.
higher taxes, job losses, higher inflation - are all predicted in a marxist utopian new zealand, and of course Peter Dumbhead of the United Fascist party are worse than the Taliban, they wont let me smoke a cone anymore.


Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Technorati
Oh, and other governments have let you? ...
Oh, and other governments have let you? (Smoke Cones)
Wow Lucifer, thats the most uncomprehensive, political essay I have ever read. Nice use of the word "Taliban" tho, shows good use of words. I think the "Peter Dumbhead" joke could have had a bit more thought put into it. But, over all, not a bad effort, I give you 3/10.
xxx Lucy
[ http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=3240 ]
i vote that this thread gets moved to ...
i vote that this thread gets moved to another forum.
i vote that this thread is stupid, ...
i vote that this thread is stupid, almost as stupid as Peter Dunns hair. This is the stupidest thread I have ever seen in my life, it's stupider than that one, that time.
xxx Lucy
[ http://www.mp3.com.au/artist.asp?id=3240 ]
to rip off both your post 'quirks' ...
to rip off both your post 'quirks'
i rate this topic 0/10. i vote that lucifer sam fucks off and never annoys me with his no hoper anti everything bullshit diatribe ever again.
lucifer you are fuckin pathetic.
i vote that jimi gets stoned to ...
i vote that jimi gets stoned to death...your a fucking imperialist dog going by what society tells you to do (no i am not islamic either)
why am i 'anti everything' cos i find society highly depressing, youve gotta fight it if you think its screwed up.
*Laughs uncontrollably*...
*Laughs uncontrollably*
Awh hey! It's not the most eloquent ...
Awh hey! It's not the most eloquent topic for sure but I'm feeling a little miffed at the new government myself. I voted for a liberal left wing government and now we are facing a conservatist 'centre' right government. The Taleban call is a little silly, but I too get concerned when religion is mixed with politics. The very first statement I heard from the United party was one of their MP's saying he'd like a review of the abortion laws in NZ backing it up with this stunning peice of logic "imagine the public outcry if 10,000 baby whales were aborted in NZ every year..."
I've applauded pratically every move Helen has made over the past term, but right now I'm feeling like I want my vote back. I don't want to "fuck the government" but I sure hope Helen has the strength and will to keep the more rightist ideals of United in check, and stay true to the leftist values of those who voted for her.
And for the record I want a bloody referendum on the GE Moratorium issue - it's an important issue that affects all NZers now and in the future and every one of us should get a say.
why are we facing a conservatist centre ...
why are we facing a conservatist centre right government?
because labour, who have by far the largest amount of seats in the house, are centre left?
because labour signed up with united to avoid another costly election when the greens pull their support in a few months?
because this signature with united is a symbolic gesture, in which united get little to no policy concessions and no members in cabinet?
doesnt sound very rightist to me.
and i would appreciate it if lucifer sam bought up points like you did, rather than saying fuck everything other than drugs.
I voted for policies. I have only a ...
I voted for policies. I have only a vague idea of their position on the Political Spectrum. I don't care. I vote for what I feel is important. Left wing, Right wing, drumstick, I don't care. Politicians make honest promises that they find out they can't keep for whatever reason and some just lie. Politics is such a mess. I leave it to the pros.
Polictics...schmolitics. I am fukking ...
Polictics...schmolitics. I am fukking sikk about talkign about it, hearing about it etc.
I am just gutted at this prospect that United Future is largely made up of Christian party (didnt even freaking realise that they were a coalition) - but yes the christian part has taken over and their stands are as follows;
- Sex education should not be allowed at schools
- Condoms & contraception should not be readily available to kids - because this is indirectly 'advertising sex' to the youngsters
- Every person affected by AIDS should be on a public 'list' so that we allll know who they are...because they must, they must be homosexual or sleep arounds beacuse only they have aids...i mean that is the only way that you can come in contact w/ the virus right? (tongue in cheek)
- IT IS ALL BULLSHIT. I dont actually believe that such ludicrous & crazy values would actually be put in place really do you? It would just be outrageous, not to mention a tremendous step backwards. Imagine, no contraception, it wouldnt make kids stop having sex if they werent fukking educated about what happens when you have sex. It wouldnt stop kids curiosity get the better of them...How can such people even attempt to put uch thins in place...I cant even begin to explain the stupidity not too mention the consequences.
Wicked for people that dont want to have sex until they are married, respect to that. But personally I have a boyfriend, and we dont know whats gonna happen with us, i dont even really believe in marriage. so I would just be up shit creek really would I?Someone needs to talk to these brain washed idiots who are trying to inforce, what may not be everyones morals and values, on the country. why has our government even remotely listened to these people? Its just fukking cunning what has occured with this united future party. Cant say I had a clue with what they were or their values before the election, but people that voted for united future have got more than what they bargained for. Stefan...politicians & pros - i assume you mean the fukkers in parliament. No such thing.
// Sex education should not be allowed ...
// Sex education should not be allowed at schools
didnt they also want to put a stop to family planning centres?
self-righteous wankers.
Yeah they did, how fukked is that?...
Yeah they did, how fukked is that?
well i agree with you guys that some ...
well i agree with you guys that some mp's coming into parliament for united are christian fundamentalists. this is bad.
however, in reality, they wont get to do shit - the only person who actually matters is peter dunne, who is a definite moderate centrist. so all is fine with the world...... yeah right, but it depends on your viewpoint i guess.
This I know, jimi, it wouldnt actually ...
This I know, jimi, it wouldnt actually occur. it is just a scarey thought that there are some sykos in power that think like this! I was just basically outraged at such thoughts. Hence the ranting & raving above...
Shit......thats there policies? ...
Shit......thats there policies? Wow......can never see that happening but scary thought that people think like that.
I just read this: "Paul Adams, who ...
I just read this:
"Paul Adams, who lost his seat in Parliament after the special votes were counted, will come back into Parliament for United Future to replace Mrs Chal. "
I just read on xtramsn news that Paul Adams originaly lost his seat because of his view on people with AIDS being labelled. I just re-read the article and now there are bits edited out-including that. Can anyone tell me if that was why Paul Adams lost his seat or what?
im pretty sure that's not the reason. ...
im pretty sure that's not the reason. he lost his seat after special votes were counted.
greens got lots of special votes - enough for an extra seat - nelsons mike ward gets into parliament - doesnt really change that much apart from that the aids psycho isnt in - altho now he apparently is - dammit.
not sure why the greens extra seat comes at the expense of united, can anyone tell me?
I am stoked that the Greens got an ...
I am stoked that the Greens got an extra seat. Why question a good thing?
"I just read on xtramsn news that Paul ...
"I just read on xtramsn news that Paul Adams originaly lost his seat because of his view on people with AIDS being labelled. I just re-read the article and now there are bits edited out-including that. Can anyone tell me if that was why Paul Adams lost his seat or what?"
Seriously, did you just make that up? He said that like 10 years ago, when AIDS was far-less widespread. He has recently said his comments were ignorant, and he has apologised for them.
Pitchblack, I'd love to know where you get your information, because I just went to the party's website to substantiate your very big claims, and I found nothing that agrees with what you said, and a huge amount that blatantly contradicts your assertions.
Re sex ed and condoms: "Schools have a great part to play in the growth of teenagers. Curricula should include programmes dealing with all aspects of health and physical well-being, including relationship and values education, sex education, self awareness coping with family life and parental break-up and skills for personal security."
If their supposed stands on these other issues were so significant, you'd think they would be listed as part of the party's official position, wouldn't you? And yet it is nowhere to be seen by my eyes. Please point out where they say the things you claim.
OR, could it be that your post above is just a lump of absolutely untrue shite, and you are horribly misleading people into joining you in hating this political party because of what seems to be your illogical prejudices? I guess we'll never know...
Teina, why shouldn't Christians be represented in parliament? If it is fine to have representative politicians pushing Maori issues, or gay issues, or environmental issues, or business issues, why is it suddenly so wrong to have representatives for a sizable portion of the New Zealand population? I thought the whole point of MMP was to give all the minority groups in New Zealand a voice. Let's not also forget that they had to be voted in in the first place, meaning people wanted them there. If there was a political party touting blatantly racist lines for example (some would argue there already is...), and enough people voted for them, then it doesn't matter if you or I don't like it, because the point is that enough people DO like it. It's what democracy is all about. WILL OF THE PEOPLE. If you don't like that, why don't you go find a country that was built on communist ideals, and is governed by a few of the intellectual elite telling the humble proletariat what they can and can't do.
Oh no wait, those all collapsed, because the system was fundamentally flawed. Oops.
(As a sidenote, while I was raised christian and believe in a god, I don't really belong to any religious group. Also, I voted Labour and while I disagree with some things United stand for, I recognise I have no more right to throw them out of parliament simply because I disagree with them than I have any right to throw out the National, NZ First or the Greens, whom I also disagree with. I realise that these things should not affect my argument in anyway, but I suspect they probably will.)
[ http://www.united.org.nz ]
I don't have the right to stop you ...
I don't have the right to stop you expressing your opinion, any more than I have the right to stop sexist or racist people from expressing their opinions. However, it doesn't mean you are any less ignorant and hateful.
"Whether or not the party website says it, the news media (rightly or wrongly) has been reporting members of the United Future party as having the policies that you accuse pitchblack of inventing."
I never said pitchblack invented anything, and I didn't mean to imply s/he had. What I did say was that everything that was stated above is incorrect and by stating these incorrect facts it is misleading to other people. Whether this was intentional or not is irrelevant. This is the same situation as if I had have come on here spouting a bunch of crap about Winston Peters and then said SEE THAT'S WHY MAORIS SUCK OMG THEY SHOULD NOT BE IN PARLIAMENT PS I AM A MORON.
And why exactly is the democratic process flawed because someone is elected that YOU don't agree with? It's stated above the Greens have nine seats. I'm sure there would be many Act supporters that completely disagree with their views, and yet it seems that most of these recognise their right to be in parliament if that many people voted for them.
To do otherwise is to become dangerously close to a form of intellectual elitism where someone must be wrong if they disagree with you, because you obviously have all the answers. Sadly this patronising ivory tower attitude is in my experience more common on the left of the political spectrum, which makes it more difficult to swallow peoples' (at times) ignorant and intolerant views.
Read your post again, and then wonder if you are coming off as the most open-minded of people, or if you are simply wanting to restrict a group of people from having a voice because it conflicts with your own bigoted views. kthx.
Wow - you read a lot into my post. Any ...
Wow - you read a lot into my post. Any "bigotry" I might have towards the Christian faith is as a direct result of being confronted on a daily basis withm their beliefs - the example I gave was this idea that we are all sinners and can only be saved, and the particular form of christianity being espoused on that day is the way to be saved. Having that crap crammed down my throat at school and thereafter has done much to shape my attitudes. If a complete inability to believe in "God" and the Christian way, seeing the whole superstructure as ludicrous is bigotry, then so be it. I would remind you that, historically, Christians don't come off to well when it comes to the old bigotry stakes.
As for my democracy being flawed comment - it reflects my lack of ability to believe that just because Party A (whatever political flavour they might be) gets 51% of the votes, they somehow have the right to determine what happens to the other 49%. Democracy, as it has been practiced here until recently and wherever it relies upon a simple majority, has a history of being less than kind to minorities and those who do not conform to prevailing tastes and standards. MMP, in allowing more small parties get a vote, goes some way to redressing the problem.
Oh, and what's the difference between ...
Oh, and what's the difference between asking "Seriously, did you just make that up?" and suggesting that pitchblack invented something?
"Wow - you read a lot into my post. Any ...
"Wow - you read a lot into my post. Any "bigotry" I might have towards the Christian faith is as a direct result of being confronted on a daily basis withm their beliefs - the example I gave was this idea that we are all sinners and can only be saved, and the particular form of christianity being espoused on that day is the way to be saved. Having that crap crammed down my throat at school and thereafter has done much to shape my attitudes. If a complete inability to believe in "God" and the Christian way, seeing the whole superstructure as ludicrous is bigotry, then so be it. I would remind you that, historically, Christians don't come off to well when it comes to the old bigotry stakes."
Yes, because lumping a huge amount of people into one group based on your experiences with an extreme minority of these isn't bigoted or ignorant or plain moronic. On this same point, anarchists, atheists, vegans/straightedgers, and environmental activists are all complete idiots and incapable of coming up with logical arguments. As the Green party is made up solely of these groups they should not be allowed in parliament and their opinion is worthless, despite how many people voted for them.
[img - rolleyes]
"As for my democracy being flawed comment - it reflects my lack of ability to believe that just because Party A (whatever political flavour they might be) gets 51% of the votes, they somehow have the right to determine what happens to the other 49%. Democracy, as it has been practiced here until recently and wherever it relies upon a simple majority, has a history of being less than kind to minorities and those who do not conform to prevailing tastes and standards. MMP, in allowing more small parties get a vote, goes some way to redressing the problem."
You contradict yourself. United Future is a party that got 10% or so of the vote; it is a minor party. If you are so against the situation in which they are allowed into parliament, then you are against MMP, because this is the system that it could be argued gives smaller parties too much power and allows them to "hold the country to ransom" (and other such rhetoric). The situation here you seem to be so vehemently against would never have happened under FPP - in fact, it is situations like these that are the whole point MMP was introduced.
"Oh, and what's the difference between asking "Seriously, did you just make that up?" and suggesting that pitchblack invented something?"
That comment wasn't directed at pitchblack. I also misread the post I was referencing, and would like to apologise to Soph_ie. I would edit it if I could. XtraMSN news seems to be pretty fucked up if what she says is correct though...
No I didnt make that up! Lol. Its what ...
No I didnt make that up! Lol. Its what it said! I don't know how much you can rely on their journalism but no shit its what it said on there before it got edited out.
Whether or not the party website says ...
Whether or not the party website says it, the news media (rightly or wrongly) has been reporting members of the United Future party as having the policies that you accuse pitchblack of inventing. She perhaps makes an error in reading the views of individual members as party policy.
As for "WILL OF THE PEOPLE" - instead of saying to people to leave the country to some hypothetical place, why not recognise that we do have the right to question the validty of the democratic process, right here in this country, if we think that the results it produces sucks? We have been lucky that we have not voted in our very own Adolph Hitler, but it is a vulnerability with the system. Nor can I see any problem with challenging the rights of christians to Parliamentary seats, and voting accordingly - my personal view is that there is no difference between christianity (and its quaint belief that we are all born sinners and need saving by some mythical omniscient but pretty much useless on a day to day basis being) and widespread mental illness. You won't agree, but I don't think you have the right to stop me expressing my view.
[ external link ]
its because in the final tally thats ...
its because in the final tally thats the proportions that were carved up, and unniteds overall support dropped, mainly cause the people overseas haven't seen the worm ;)
lucy if you think that you are a fan of ...
lucy if you think that you are a fan of peter dunne thats fine by me, and what i was writing was not a political essay so please, brush up your knowlege on "opinions" and "political essays"
in the past 3 years how many acts of treason and other crimes has Aunty helen committed - lets see A - Scrapping the Air Combat Wing, Selling sacred land to yankee doodle infidels, and allowing the evils of corporate corruption to wreck our national sovereignty. as well as kidnapping thousands of peace-loving grateful dead and bob marley fans and forging a painting.
but that is not my point, my point is that Helen Clarkensky/ Jim Stalinderton and Peter Hitler Dunne are lamers, Nandor is the only eal person in parliament. Nandor U Fucken Rock dude, keep up the smoking.
Lucifer_Sam please brush up on your ...
Lucifer_Sam
please brush up on your political facts.
// Selling sacred land to yankee doodle infidels
Hardly anything to do with Helen. If you're talking about Nick's Head, it was already privately owned, and the Government actually stepped in to make sure the new owner respected the cultural importance of the site.
// forging a painting
Signed her name to one she didn't paint. Dishonest, but not forgery.
//allowing the evils of corporate corruption to wreck our national sovereignty
ey? explain.
//kidnapping thousands of peace-loving grateful dead and bob marley fans
umm, ditto.
// Scrapping the Air Combat Wing
hardly the biggest loss in the world. A small squad of 30 year jets that'd last 10 minutes in the face of any concerted (and highly unlikely) invasion. What's wrong with focussing our limited resources on the armed forces that actually get to see some work: the navy and army.
noizyboy here goes my reply // ...
noizyboy
here goes my reply
// Selling sacred land to yankee doodle infidels
sacred maori land is sacred maori land - quit selling New Zealand icons to evil, imperialist zionist backed swinebags who want to destroy the world, its no wonder 9/11 happened.
// forging a painting
Signed her name to one she didn't paint. Dishonest, but not forgery.
//allowing the evils of corporate corruption to wreck our national sovereignty
america has destroyed new zealand sovereinty in a number of ways - force feeding its "drug war"on New Zealand shores ie. DARE, PRYDE, or else if we dont we'd be faced with "economic or military sanctions" fuck ameriKKKa and everything those fucken swinebag infidels stand-for
//kidnapping thousands of peace-loving grateful dead and bob marley fans
thousands of cannabis smokers yet faggot arse trendys and boyracers and their ho-bag slapper g/fs get away with everything
// Scrapping the Air Combat Wing
thje biggest act of fucken treason ever commited in New Zealand, australia has mocked us for this, as a result of spetember 11 it is absolutely essential we have an airforce, if i where to honour my country in anyway, id have all 18 year olds rounde dup into the army as well as bring back our fucken airforce, with more powerful modarn aircraft.
but no as a result of labour/prc/united facist party - i have no respet for this fucke dup, corruptd swinebag infidel nation
fuck new zelaand.