Do looks matter for a band?

This topic has proablby been done before, many times. But I'm wondering how the physical appearence of those in a band effects perception of the music. Obviousely the music is primary to...liking the music, but would Led Zepplin have been successful if Robert plant was bald? If Kurt Cobain looked like the milkman would anybody have cared? If Marvin was a short, white and wore glasses would any woman want his babeis? I think no.

It seems like it's harder to get into good music if the band members look like accountants. Certain bands of the Flying Nun type spring to mind. It's a ego projection thing, you don't want to be them, if them is being fat, old or ugly, no matter how good the music might be. Face it, the best musicians are also pretty good looking, or at least have character. Looking like a pudgy average joe just doesn't do it.

Moronic topic endeth.

Forums: The Bar,

// Moronic topic endeth.

nah, that's a good topic. I actually asked the exact same thing of the UK industry bigwigs who were here for the Resonate seminars last year.

And they didn't really answer it.

They offered up Keane as an example of an ugly band who 'made it' despite their looks, but the overwhelming impression I got was that unless you were good looking, only clever marketing and a good photographer were going to save the day. Particularly in this day and age.

It hasn't always been true though. There's been plenty of ugly rock-stars over the years. Iggy Pop, for all his excellent muscle tone, could be mistaken for the local town bum if you saw him walking down the street. Lou Reed, Thom Yorke, Frank Black, Mark Knopfler - there's plenty of examples of bands with wholly unattractive lead singers making it big.

// If Kurt Cobain looked like the milkman would anybody have cared?

Kurt did look like a milkman. He was very normal looking. Odd thing is, when I first heard Smells Like Teen Spirit, I always envisioned him as this huge, bearded lumberjack-looking guy. How surprised I was to see that he was just this little frail blonde milkman.

external link ]

It must be a slow day for you to be using your two trolls to talk to each other, sir.

//It hasn't always been true though. There's been plenty of ugly rock-stars over the years. Iggy Pop, for all his excellent muscle tone, could be mistaken for the local town bum if you saw him walking down the street. Lou Reed, Thom Yorke, Frank Black, Mark Knopfler//

Iggy pop and Lou Reed were/are not ugly. Your mixing up scruffy looking with being generally unattractive. Granted Mark Knopfler is. Kurt Cobain looked like Brad Pitt, perfect pretty model type features.

// I always envisioned him as this huge, bearded lumberjack-looking guy.
EELS!

I don't think looks matter so much for men outside of mainstream pop. I hereby nominate Franz Ferdinand, who look like the line-up for Beauty and the Geek. Also, Oasis. Also, Jarvis Cocker. Supergrass were the (self-proclaimed, I believe) "world's ugliest band" when they first got big. And one of the Arctic Monkeys has terrible acne scars. Then you've got the hiphop artists like snoop dogg, 50 cent, nelly..

Granted, I can't think of any fugly female musicians, although I always thought PJ Harvey was really really peculiar.

Mind you, I'm of the personal opinion that there aren't that many genuinely ugly people at all - maybe just 5% of the population, if that? Most people that are plain or odd-looking can be transformed with a new haircut, better-suited clothes, and a maybe a couple of lessons in swagger. I wager that's the main difference between any given indie band and your common-or-garden geeky-looking office worker.

Of course, any popular musician over 30 automatically blows your theory, since old people are ugly by definition.

external link ]

Iggy pop is so unattractive. His face, honestly, yuck.

And Kurt was normal looking. I wouldn't be surprised if my milkman looked like him. Don't believe all those Q and Rolling Stone portraits, because...

// Most people that are plain or odd-looking can be transformed...

Heather talks the truth.

Honestly, there are dozens of unattractive people in rock that get the makeover/airbrush treatment once they start to achieve a little fame. And even before, in the modern age.

// I can't think of any fugly female musicians

catching even a glimpse of Celine Dion makes my eyes water. Especially when she's wearing one of those 'slinky' one-piece figure-hugging body-suit things. Oh ... god ... I'm going to spew just thinking about it...

Hello? Meatloaf?

I think the less physically attractive also have the option of hiding behind a persona/image. I wouldn't particulary call norman cook attractive, but as fatboy slim ...

kurt cobain was a handsome guy.
at least as handsome as countless stars who came before
rdor this topic is complete codswollop.
alison moyet,
lyell lovet
roy orbison
buddy holly
janis fucking joplin,
billy joel
elton john
freddie bucktooth mercury
simon and garfunkel
motley crue
seal
tracy chapman
ozzy osbourne
tenacious d
missy elliot {i think she's hot-but the weight could sway othere)
ac-dc
the rolling stones
the beach boys
prodigy
etcetc

rope, I like your new 'do, the pigtails are very becoming.

Shane MacGowan?

external link ]

//I don't think looks matter so much for men outside of mainstream pop. I hereby nominate Franz Ferdinand, who look like the line-up for Beauty and the Geek. Also, Oasis. Also, Jarvis Cocker. Supergrass were the (self-proclaimed, I believe) "world's ugliest band" when they first got big. And one of the Arctic Monkeys has terrible acne scars. Then you've got the hiphop artists like snoop dogg, 50 cent, nelly.//

none of the those people/bands you mention are ugly.
We are obviousely on a different page.

Moby

Frank Black

//As for your idea of what's ugly and what's not, I think the Gallagher brothers are way uglier than Mark Knopfler.
//

you are crazy.

I don't have time for this cause I need to start work, but characterful is slightly dorky, perhaps a bit ugly, but not *gross*. I meant just plain gross, unnatrractive. You know what I mean. None of those artists except for perhaps elton and knopfler could be described as that.

// I meant just plain gross, unnatrractive. You know what I mean.

But how many people are really that ugly? Is the ratio of beautiful/normal/characterful/ugly people really any different in the popstar population than the general population?

I see lots of unnattractive people every day, on the train, on the bus, in the mirror. They could never be 'cool' in any sense of the word, this precluded them from a career in music - in general nobody is going to care about what they feel deep down inside, in song form. I don't think many people would get down to a bald guy with glasses 'rocking out', simply becuae such a person trying to do that would look like a dickhead .....

Perhaps the DJ is an excpetion.

Oh for fuck's sake rdor, why don't you just buy yourself a whip, flagellate yourself on the street and shut the fuck up?

genisis
eminem
chumbawumba
dr dre
stevie wonder
pink floyd
the minutemen
zz top
ray columbus and the invaders
the cranberries
madonna
robert johnson
eric clapton
the spice girls
haley westenra
matty j

metallica

//But how many people are really that ugly? Is the ratio of beautiful/normal/characterful/ugly people really any different in the popstar population than the general population?

That is actually quite interesting point. My theory a while ago was:

- often people at high school that didn't fit into a 'teen movie/magazine' image mold in terms of appearance seemed to become interested in alternative activities (often music, art, subcultures etc) and when they became adults (and gained more confidence in their uniqueness) they were more likely to be the musicians and artists celebrated by the boring 'pretty' conservative masses. In other words, the quirky ugly ducklings grew into the characters that became icons.

//I don't think many people would get down to a bald guy with glasses 'rocking out'

external link ]

uglier without glasses??

external link ]

this guy needs to be a rock star...

external link ]

//genisis
eminem
chumbawumba
dr dre
stevie wonder
pink floyd
the minutemen
zz top
ray columbus and the invaders
the cranberries
madonna
robert johnson
eric clapton
the spice girls
haley westenra

//

none of them are/were truly ugly, not in youth anyway. You only prove that you have very high standards in regards to beauty. (Haley Westenra??)

//rdor this topic is complete codswollop.
alison moyet,
lyell lovet
roy orbison
buddy holly
janis fucking joplin,
billy joel
elton john
freddie bucktooth mercury
simon and garfunkel
motley crue
seal
tracy chapman
ozzy osbourne
tenacious d
missy elliot {i think she's hot-but the weight could sway othere)
ac-dc
the rolling stones
the beach boys
prodigy
etcetc
//

again rope we are on a different page.
You are talking about *characterful* ugly (as in somewhat funny looking)
I am talking about *ugly* ugly (not the funny type). Just plain unattractrive. Nonoe of the people you mention fit into that. Comprehend?

look at the photos ..... dumbfuck

Well, perhaps "characterful" is simply being able to make the best of a bad nose? If you could give some indication that there is a statistically significant difference between the proportion of *ugly* ugly people among the general population and the proportion of *ugly* ugly popular musicians, then maybe you'll have a logical argument.

As for your idea of what's ugly and what's not, I think the Gallagher brothers are way uglier than Mark Knopfler.

and add phil collins and the entire cast of def leppard

tom waites

elvis costello

the b-52s

radiohead

aphex twin

bill haley

the presidents of the u.s.a

rdor.....just give me a yell when i stumble on ur definition,k?

manic street preachers...

will oldham

paul holmes

shaquille o'neil

no one is going to come and see your band if you are ugly. No one is going to love you if youre ugly. in fact, the reason your father abandonned you is because you are ugly. thats what this is all about isn't it?

*fingers in ears*
eeeeaaaaaaaaa not listening eeeeeaaeeaeaae

Hmm, touchy subject.

I say, if you do look like you have fallen out of the ugly tree and hit every branch and got caught in the roots below...you need to compensate on being extremely good musian or good in the sack.

aha. the prince approach.

So that's where you've been huh Natalie - sleeping with Prince?

hot =/

// sleeping with Prince?

pah! nothing but top-notch high-cheek-boned long-limbed scandanavian rock gods for me!

Oh yeah, Agnetha called - you left your panties at her house, and she can't mail them back to you cos that would involve leaving the house.

gramsci

/Looking like a pudgy average joe just doesn't do it.

Well, Elton John doesn't star in his own videos anymore. And then you've got Blues Traveller, more recently New Order (I think?)... Other than that, I can't think of any other examples where a succesful musician/band has made concessions based on their relative 'attractiveness'.
When you consider how many beautiful looking commercial disasters there have been, I'd hardly call attractiveness a pre-requisite to 'cutting it'.
Don't you think that the spot-light, by it's very nature, 'celebritizes' average joes?