The exclusive brethren

Last nght I saw an interesting documenatry on the exclusive brethren. Does anyone here know someone that 'escaped'?

A strange cult. It was interesting to hear one of the brethren say they are the most open minded of people, yet they avaoid any place that is too worldly. Also almost anything that is related to media is banned as the devils work. Its funny that they ban computers, yet all their bibles are printed with the aid of computer software. The whole thing is set up to isolate them as a comunity. They are forbidden from going to university, just in case they learn to think. I guess that makes them easier to control by whomever is in charge.

What struck me as really odd was in one of the scenes there was a couple kds playing a songs on some big electric piano (which probably had a computer in it), and they were singing a modern song, I think it was that theme song from the angel movie with Meg Ryan and Nicholas Cage. I wonder where thay learnt it from?

I find it really sad that there are people who like that sort of conformist rule bound life. The psychologist on the show said it is a wonderful community to be in, as long as you toe the line.

Religion has to be one of the biggest evils in our world. Some much bad stuff is done in the name of religion. Though maybe I have it wrong. Religion could just be a tool, like GE =D. It's how we use it that is bad.

Forums: The Bar,

//I think it was that theme song from the angel movie with Meg Ryan and Nicholas Cage. I wonder where thay learnt it from?

It was that most holy of singers, Mr Robbie Williams.

//Religion has to be one of the biggest evils in our world. Some much bad stuff is done in the name of religion. Though maybe I have it wrong. Religion could just be a tool, like GE =D. It's how we use it that is bad.

But the people inside the community are really well off, as long as they're happy with the ideaology - the documentary also said that they never had to worry about finding a place to live, or a job, or friends. So that's not bad. It's not my idea of a good time now, but if I hadn't known any different, and if the people in the community were behaving decently, then where's the problem?

//They are forbidden from going to university, just in case they learn to think

now dark nick, i'm curious did they actually give that as the reasoning?
because God knows university is the worst place for learning to think
most people emerge from university less capable of independent thought than when they went in
and worst of all
most people emerge from university believing they are more capable of thinking independently than those who never went

holding up rdor as an example

//because God knows university is the worst place for learning to think

bahaha, pity he only told the exclusive brethren

it was more an issue of learning to "question"

i've met 3 year olds who ask better questions than university graduates
they've all been trained what is appropriate to ask and what is the appropriate way of asking

In some ways I think the first three years of university are about constraining and moulding thought. And also constraining the type of questions that you'll ask. It's usually only after that, that really attempting to tear at the heart of stuff is encouraged. So perhaps the problem is that too many leave after only 3 years, or that the reins aren't loosened a year earlier.

Of course the other problem is that serious learning comes from questioning, and drifting through on a C average doesn't require that, just a mindless repetition of some of what the lecturer said...

so your saying you'll be less molded and constrained by not going to university at all?

// so your saying you'll be less molded and constrained by not going to university at all?

they'll be more variation across a large group of individuals, but at an individual level you're still going to be constrained by your personal history. University has a somewhat disarming habit of constraining some things... like rules for arguing etc., which in some respects will make graduates more homogeneous as a group. However, there are plenty of students who don't conform to the mould. Some will learn very well to behave in the correct way, but still privately differ, whereas others won't do very well because they haven't learnt that correct way thing.

correct way thing- as in 'mould' as opposed tojust plain old 'mold'?

LG your post's got me thinking

//Some will learn very well to behave in the correct way,

i need clarification on what you mean by 'behave'

you specifically referring to the accepted standard of debate/argument/dialogue behaviour?
or just general behaviour?
ie.
i'm recall an instance of a student who successfully fucked her tutor to get better grades.

and also 'won't do very well'

within this conformist regime? or just in general?

obviously i never made it past school C english, but humour me pleaser

A good example of what I mean is people who learn to recite a sort of "model" argument of evolution, while still privately remaining strong in their belief in creation. However, it needn't just be about religion at all. Actually, I wonder a bit about it happening in politics and economics, where on the whole parroting a "model" left and right-wing argument might be appropriate. On the other hand, sometimes the highest grades go to those students who challenge the belief model of the lecturer. Perhaps more in politics?

Or a flatmate of mine who acheived excellent grades in relevant courses in psychology, while still privately holding firmly to extreme beliefs about repressed/suppressed memory. Under current knowledge, it is perfectly possible to have completely forgotten something, and then have it reactivated. And traumatic early events usually lead to earlier first memories, but there are still limits of what it is possible to remember prior to the age of 2. Those are a few examples.

//And traumatic early events usually lead to earlier first memories, but there are still limits of what it is possible to remember prior to the age of 2.

You're right about that bit! I was only 1 when we went to Disneyland, and my sisters refusing to let me go in the Tom Sawyer house still haunts me.

Moving house prior to being 1, being female, and being Maori are also good predictors of earlier first memories...

there was a tom sawyer's house?
maybe they lied
thanks limegreen

Sorry, that should be prior to 2.
Interestingly, the mean age of first memory is around 2.5, with female and Maori both minus about 3 months. There are some interesting debates about self concept relating to certain asian countries having a mean age of first memory closer to 5.

//Moving house prior to being 1, being female, and being Maori are also good predictors of earlier first memories

Well 2 out of 3 ain't bad.

There's a Tom Sawyer tree house on Tom Sawyer Island Rope - or at least there used to be, in the olden days...

//now dark nick, i'm curious did they actually give that as the reasoning?
because God knows university is the worst place for learning to think
most people emerge from university less capable of independent thought than when they went in
and worst of all
most people emerge from university believing they are more capable of thinking independently than those who never went//

and this statement makes you NOT a wanker also?

come on 'dor, tell us how university got you thinking independently

it hasn't, I spent my first 3 year doing piss easy subjects, I barely got my uni entrance, I struggle with anything involving maths, but I still keep hearing these older 'school of life' guys voice their feelings of inadequacy cause they didn't stay at school. Oh and I can't spell.

sounds like you be spending too much time hanging out with older 'school of life' types. just give them an enrollment pack and tell them to fuck off, if it's pissing you off.

I sounded like a real jerk then

nah that was 'uninvited' by Alanis, robbie sucketh

narp it was the robbie williams angels song

yes twas robbie

ahhh, thats ok then. The immortal Robbie permeates everything, thats how the Excl Bre learnt his song.

I got a really huge smile from a group of brethern women one day, i had a scarf on and my long blonde hair was flowing down my back........ the smile turned quickly as I stepped out from behind the car and they saw my jeans, it made me feel quite sad

//I find it really sad that there are people who like that sort of conformist rule bound life.

First of all, I think you underestimate just how much of a conformist rule-bound life we all lead. Which do you think is worse - being brought up in a loving environment, but with strict guidelines about what you should wear or do in your recreation time - or having all the choice in the world, but being constrained by your own laziness, or by economic hardship, or any number of regulations - government red tape, peer pressure, all sorts of stuff that slip under the radar? And how many people actually manage to break out and, say, move overseas, and then end up in the same mundane routine that prompted them to get out in the first place?

This leads to my second point which is that I don't think having a greater breadth of choice is necessarily a good thing. Your quality of life isn't measured by the choices you have, as highlighted in the previous point, but what you make of your circumstances. Personally, this has been a serious issue for me recently; I think the breadth of choice in the western world has served to make individuals listless and shallow. Average people have so much going on around them - so much that they could do - that they just get confused and end up doing nothing. They dabble, get bored, move on.

I think there's a whole lot to be said for being born into a single well-defined all-encompassing role that keeps you busy for your whole life. You learn focus and discipline; you're more able to become a master in one field of expertise, no distractions. I've been sort of flicking through some buddhist teachings recently and they discuss occupation a lot, partly as an analogy for spiritual development, but also I think because becoming a master of a skill is a valuable end in itself. I think it's become too difficult for most of us to really master anything - including life in general - because we have too many distractions - too much choice.

I do like having the choices, but I've realised it's imperative to figure out what it is that I want for my life, and then work out ways to discipline myself better so that I can work toward it. It's so easy to get smug about the freedom of the west, but when those smug people just work in an office for 8 hours a day, then go home tired & sit in front of the TV, occasionally get drunk at gigs and spend saturdays hungover, & talk about these great ideas but never get around to doing anything about them, then I think there's something wrong.

Meh, I'm not trying to moralise, really, just for the sacrifices that the exclusive brethren make, I think they probably gain a lot in return. They don't need your pity.

good points,
the words kung fu as derived from the words gong fu can literally be translated as 'time' and 'effort'
those essential elements in mastering a discipline
general understanding of 'gong fu' requires no intrinsic talent,
simply the acknowledgement that with enough of the aforementioned elements you will reach masterhood of any discipline you chose to
time allowing....

//you will reach masterhood of any discipline you chose to
//time allowing....

Yeah, borne out in hindu culture as well - I'm fascinated with the idea that it takes multiple lifetimes to master the sitar. Just that little fragment of information totally encompasses the value of occupation in personal (& spiritual) development for me.

Could it be that the OP just doesn't like their restrictive morality around sexuality and recreation? Funny we don't hear such statements about Huri Krisnas.

The OP?

And there are plenty of people who criticise aspects of Hare Krishnas too.

Original poster

Your right, I just don't like their restrictive morality.