Shihad vs The Ex-Fan...comment here

You guys are no doubt busting to chat about this Tom Larkin/Tomble/[Shihad] vs Mike Hunt/Ex-Shihad fan debate. The self control we've witnessed (and had to exert ourselves) has been amazing!
But we're at breaking point, so we've made this topic here for everyone to feel free to add their own commentary on the debate.

We'll move all the comments, that weren't made by Tomble or Mike Hunt, out of the "OK Tomble ..." topic to here... Hope that's not too confusing? righto. go for it.

Forums: BOTB,

yeah this is good,
come on lads lets 'ave it

I reckon Tom's doing a pretty fucking awesome job of answering your questions Mike, and your not doing the responses justice by your pathetic answers. however one thing i am interested in finding out from tom is why 'just like everybody else' is on tge, imho it was crap the first time it was released and doesn't fit on tge AT ALL, either musically or chronologically. I know Shihad have said a lot about how they wrote a shitload of songs for tge and it was a great songwriting period (the absolutely fantasitc b-sides to pacifier are a testimony to that), if so why were some of the new songs from the 98 general electric sessions not on tge instead of 'just like...' ? not trying to be rude (like i think mike is a bit) but i've always wondered. personally just to express a viewpoint on what's already been said in this discussion, i fucking love Killjoy, its my favourite album ever, i wish more people knew about it. but i kinda don't at the same time, cos its great to belong to a unique club of people who have it and love it (what i would do for it on vinyl...... hmmmm) and know that it makes them feel the same way it makes me feel. its raw and its honest and it sounds like Shihad sweated blood over it. yes the fish album was a change stylistically and having read tom's mammoth response (thanks a lot man!) i understand why it was made. i don't love it as much as killjoy but its still fricking awesome. first time i saw shihad was at the james cab in 1998 on the blue light tour, i remember being totally blown away by lala land/home again/yr head is a rock and buying fish the very next day. totally agree that it needs more bottom end though. as far as live concerts go i wish shihad would play more of their earlier stuff however i'm not so naive as to believe this is as much of a reality as i would like - fact is, they've picked up a lot of fans with tge (thanks to pacifier as much as the awesome production - which is not a bad thing - interestingly enough when i first heard pacifier i predicted that it could be the 'venus' of the year 2000 - thankfully it was a popular song but its fucking awesome that Shihad retained their credibility where the feelers did not), anyway back to the point, tge songs scream to be heard live and they deserveto be heard by fans who bought tge. i do think shihad could play for longer and play more stuff of killjoy/churn - i.e debs and you again and great but i'd fucking pay a lot of money to hear bitter/gimme gimme/get up (!!! what a closer that could be!), bone orcahrd, stations.. screwtop. i won't forget bdo 99 in the mosh standing next to someone who kept screaming 'screwtop, screwtop!!!' at the top of his lungs after every song.. its a special feeling to know songs from the early shihad catalogue and identify with them. so tom maybe in the future a bit more early stuff added to the live sets? i know theres a shitload of people out there who'd appreciate it so much. as for the future - i want shihad to make an asbolute mindfuck of a next record and blow skyhigh in the US - everyone knows they deserve it and when you've got shit like staind, bizkit, linkin park, creed coming out of the US Shihad deserve to go over there and rock the fucking soulless ass out of them. i'm fucking proud of what shihad have done and so thankful for what they've given me and i wish them all the best for the future. tom thanks for answering those questions and if you wanna reply to this then thats cool and i'll write back as well. mike hunt please be a bit more respectful and take the time to write and put the effort in as tom obviously has - is there any more evidence of shihad's committal to their fans than this? fucking brilliant. rock hard. Chris. bishdafish@hotmail.com

Being such a big Shihad fan all the way from 98.....does this ring any bells...."I am IT , I am infinity, I am it, I am all, I'll take your fucking life but it's your soul I'll feed on....,CAUSE I AM IT.
Ring any bells buddy?????????

Ooooooo- watch out there, Mike, you'll have the purists on your case next! ;)

I think that's a more accurate statement!

what a debate! it has been with much interest that ive read the posts so far (is it still continuing??). i was referred to this by a friend regarding the comment of 'antangonisim between the bands after hlah released 'berlin stench' and 'jellybag' as their own'. ok well, toms right, kudos to shihad, 'berlin stench' was recorded by both hlah and shihad during their european tour. both bands are credited in the (cassette only) copies except it wasnt released and neither did it say 'hlah', purely 'the berlin stench'. also 'jellybag' which was one of the songs on 'berlin stench' was re-recorded for hlah's 'double yer strength' and was a combined effort between jon and booga mainly. yes it should have been credited unfortunately it wasnt, i guess we owe you guys some apra tom, 15$ is in the mail. my thoughts on 'berlin stench' are that im happy it just saw the light of day in the form of about 100 cassettes. it is a total snapshot of 3 weeks above the knaack club in east berlin that when i listen to it now i can still smell the place, hear the music from the three clubs below and remember how hungry we were.
back to the debate though. theres some really interesting comments being passed back and forth. as someone thats followed shihad from playing 'metallica' covers at the 'clarendon' in wellington to touring/competing with, loathing, loving them. im feeling a burning desire to put my two cents worth in. really though, mike hunt has his opinions and is entitled to them, rightly or wrongly. in this case though his opinions have piqued an interest in mr larkin which has resulted in the debate posted here. i think tom has rigourously defended each comment where possibly no defence was needed. i guess it all comes down to free speach on both sides. i have enjoyed reading the debate so far and am curious as to whether it is to be continued....

Hey Nincomjool....he he ...hope alls well with ya . Been trying to get ahold of you recently man......You know how......Love Cdoggydogg

mmmm......yes

TOMBLE - 5
MIKE HUNT - 2

the debate thus far has been very illuminating (no responsibility taken for spelling by the way) geez mike how cliche is the -i-like-your-old-stuff-better-than-your-new-stuff-angle? why do cats get so uptight when a band takes a turn stylisticly, whats the point of shihad or any one making the same album twice if you dig killjoy then you have killjoy and you can listen to it as many times as you want? slagging someone cause they had a certain haircut pair of shoes etc.. is really lame - if you were going out with someone on a date you might brush your teeth so your breath dosn't stink - is this selling your mouth out? i can't see any shame in wanting to look good in a photo. Mike you seem to be holding on to some rather dogmatic religious viewpoints, whats hard whats heavy what you can and can't look like if you want to be "real".
i'd be interested to hear tom's reply on the live show just for insights sake - i couldn't care less if 3 out of 4 cabinets were for show - if tom put some hair product in before he went on stage does that mean he has sold out - hello! i saw the auckland town hall show and shiite it changed my life, lights and banter aside the music was goood!! if there was a rock olympics shihad would definatly be getting the gold medal.
mike - at the start you didn't think you'd be thrashing it out with tom did you hahahahahaha
i reckon if you want to throw shit then at least throw it at someone that really deserves it - like zed - dickheads!!

Okay where did the debate end up and waht was the outcome??

It's the "OK Tomble You and Me" forum. I'll leave it to you to decided who's winning.

http://www.nzmusic.com/topic.cfm?i=342 ]

Come on!

I mean '...slag shit at Zed?' Whassup w dat, man? They work as hard as anyone else, why do they deserve it?

I don't know if slagging off other bands is warranted- unless they publically slag you off. At the end of the day they've got the guts to take the music they make out of their rooms and onto the stage, radio, tv, etc., as well as put their faces on the magazines and that takes guts, man, as well as hard work. As Tom said, it's not a glamorous life- what kind of life would it be to be a successful farce! Ask Milli Vanilli. There's not enough room in the NZ music industry for pretenders, anyone who's 'got there' must be doing something right. In the face of slings and arrows, they do it because it's what they do.

Anyway, you don't have to like them!! If you don't like them, you don't have to buy their record/cd/tshirt/magazine cover/bumper sticker/novelty lunchbox. You don't have to listen to their shite. However, it is a mistake to pressume that every other New Zealander shares your own taste in music, or to treat their own musical taste as somehow inferior to your own.

Recognize that we have the right the hear what we wanna hear.

-Foetusboy

BTW I support good NZ music, and I really like Shihad.

WHOA!!!!!!ok i've just read the entire TOM-MIKE debate (i haven't been here in a while, anyone miss me?:-)) and dammit it was so long my eyes are bloody watering!
Ok i Have to congratulate Tom, on the MASSIVE posts! they've really taught me a lot about the band, that i thought i already knew a lot about. Absolutely Amazing....and great writing. tHAnks for the oppurtunity.
Mike has toned things down a lot, and hasnt been here as much (or so it seems). I'm not sure whether this is a good or bad thing. I'm hoping he's learnt more about the band, and therefore will not bag out bands for petty reasons again....(i guess the whole arguement is pretty much questioning how petty the "i like your old stuff better than your new stuff" thing is) Anyway it's nice to see a friendly arguement going, b/c in a way the other posts just became a massive bitchfight and Mike wasn't going to listen to anyone else anyway.....so i'm hoping this has been a good thing for him.
I dont know, anyway it's been enlightening, i can say that much.
BTW I really like the fish c.d, and despite what people say it's still one of my favourite albums. The guys are awesome, what can i say? I'm looking forward tothe new album, some Melbourne Tours(when its done) and perhaps an install?! haha....(some ppl at gasslight were telling me how much they love you guys)
One final Question... ... though this is irrelevant to the topic.....does anyone know the name of the supergrass/johnny greenwood side project... ... i think they were called a team (not sure on that one) and i heard them once on the radio but never again.....a shame b/c they were fucking awesome! can anyone help me? clancy_vandal@hotmail.com
Well Ta-ta for now... ... ... luv PeAcHy!:-)
ps: Mike's Top 5's were in good taste, i must say.

hey everyone, long time! enjoying your comments, keep em coming. one thing tho, lets forget about this image thing, i was trying to use it as AN example of how the band had become less music focussed (in my opinion..and thats all it was). a lot of people have taken that as my main angle, but believe you me, if i was blind i'd still be bitching, coz i don't reckon the music is as good as it was. yes i like their old stuff better than their new stuff!! but i think they could have evolved in a more shall we say "artistic" way, and i make no apologies for my opinions, we've all got em'. i'm a music fan first & foremost, especially music with integrity (incidentally, i've never sold a britinney record in my life, and never will.)
hey hemi, you should put your 2 cents here, myself and others would be very interested in your view of things. coz it seems to me shihad went downhill when the hlah affiliation ended (and also with the death of gerald d-wire!) comments anyone??

hook line and sinker everytime with the zed kid's aye - although thats another thread so enough and on with the shihad stuff!!

Hmm, I've had a few listens to the Devolve EP and Churn and in my opinion so far they are a far cry from Killjoy and The General Electric. I dunno, maybe it's harder to go back than forwards or perhaps I haven't listened to them enough.
Mike, how do you mean in a more artistic way? What type of sound do you envision? I'm curious.

i think what i (& i hope sum other ppl) have learned from the tom/mike debate is not to go messing with the 'had (not that i would anyway!) ive got alla their albums & i dont think any of them are better than the others, but then, thats just my opinion ay?!

Mike you haven't given a clear reason why you think the music isn't as good as it was or why it has gone downhill- is it not heavy enough, not produced right or too many effects

I'm with Stefan what kind of sound do you think Shihad should have now?

One other thing when does the debate resume?? :oP

Here's something else-

You can't seperate the musicians from the music they create. What ever's going on in their lives, how old they are, what's most important to them... affects EVERYTHING. Even small things like how much midrange they have in their guitar sound, through to the songs they write and the way they're recorded.
So you may have liked 'old' Shihad. It seems to me that you might be in the same place you were 10 years ago, while the rest of the world's moved on. I don't blame you, sometimes I wish I could re-live the past, and I frequently do by putting on Killjoy or Churn and cranking it up. I accept that Shihad need to move on, and it is unreasonable and quite pathetic to lash them for growing up. They are always gonna do what they want to do, I respect them for that. They won't go back.
I rememeber when I was at Massey, the 'Had played at The Albert with Baconfoot. The 'Had were playing a few songs from the as yet unreleased Fish album, like Home Again and Leo Song. There were, even then, long-haired, tatooed, leather-jacket, black-jeans wearing old-school Shihad fans, screaming out for Black Sabbath covers, as well as the Devolve stuff... I'll never forget my mate starting up a come-back chant: "MORE NEW STUFF!!"

In other words, I look forward to the next album every time.

Mike, if you don't get it by now, whats left? What has yet to be covered?

-With respect

hahaha true true....
has anyone else noticed mike becoming more and more chummy with tom (and us) as his points are slowly demolished??? i believe he's trying to pull off the maneuvre where you suck up until the person loses all interest in the argument because the opposition is so bland...

keep it firing mike cos youre getting absolutely caned in this argument, if youre gonna lose you may as well go down fighting, not saying 'keep your comments comin guys im enjoying them' because in reality who wants to read posts that diss them??? you may be a masochist but even then youre almost dead (figuratively speaking.
get some balls mike and stop trying to be matey with the person youre also trying to defeat....

cya

slayer still rulz heh- heheh he heheh he heh.

na..tis still blindspott..... he heh heh heh heh......

http://www.blindspott.co.nz ]

are you stalking me jimi? its kinda creepy how you're always hot my tail after every comment i make! i'm not sucking up to anyone jimbo. i just reply to posts in a similar tone to however they're posted, you may have noticed it was tomble who chilled out when i replied to his requests to start another thread when he thought i wouldn't. and so the debate (not argument) has carried on in a reletivly civil manner. as for me "getting caned", i'm not really seeing your point there. whether or not the thread continues is up to tomble, i'll keep on as long as he does.

question jimi: if i said something you agreed with, would you acknowledge me as being right or would you disagree? i'm really curious. i'm not gonna get into another bitchmatch/ insult competition with you but you are becoming a bit of a "chatroom nazi" dude.

no im not stalking you mike. i enjoy coming to this site and frequently do so. i find it amazing that you would be so arrogant as to think i existed only to reply to messages that you post. there had been five posts after yours before i posted mine, so i really dont see how that makes me a stalker in this thread.... maybe its another one youre thinking of...? maybe not, oh well i get used to your irritating eccentricities.

you still havent answered my question. who wants to read large amounts of posts disagreeing with them?? it really made me laugh when you thanked us for all our posts, god, come on mike do you really want everyone disagreeing with you or are you simply ...... sucking up perhaps....?

'getting caned': beaten, dominated, routinely picked apart, shamed out, proven wrong, losing, being defeated, being whipped, thrashed, annihilated etc etc. do you understand me now mikey???

answer mike: i have agreed with a few things (or maybe just one thing that im aware of) and that is the thread with you and tom should be just you and tom. you said at the start "i'm probaly asking the impossible for some of you not to pipe and talk" and you were proved right, with people posting every so often. did you see me put my opinion in there like you thought i would? nope, other than to tell people to shut up. so there you go, i agreed with you then, so yes if i agree with something you say im not afraid to say so.
i mean jeez, do you think i really enjoy dismantling your arguments over and over again in the vain hope you'll see the light????

if youre not trying to get into another heated bitchfight, then why the fuck did you call me a chatroom nazi??? fucken hell you loser, make sure you know what youre trying to do. saying you dont want an argument and then calling me that is so dumb, what do you want me to do, lie down and say 'please mike, punish me for posting my opinion'?

get real, im not gonna just watch you, actually make that anybody, openly make strong statements that i disagree with. they are welcome to do so, and as you know i relish an argument so i would love it if there were more people like you around (not too many though because i would then hold great fears for the future of the human race). but they can expect a reply, and i expect not to be bitched at for posting replies. the content, sure, but calling me a chatroom nazi is the height of abstract criticism.

have fun

cya chum

jimi jimi jimi. you seem to be devoid of a sense of humour my friend. are you able to detect sarcasm in any of my posts? oh well.
i do get kind of a kick out of the fact i can get a rise out of so many people with just a couple of sentances! especially humerous when they start launching into a bunch pseudo-intellectual dribble! call me a dirty old perv but keep it up hahahahaha! your buddy mikexxxxxxx!

so you ARE a masochist, getting pleasure out of being beaten. thats not a good look aye mike.
and if you want to use sarcasm, it might be worthwhile making it a little more obvious, because 1) its quite hard to detect sarcasm in the written word and 2) at the moment it's coming out like half-hearted defensive drivel.

your PAL

it is easy to laugh something off when you don't understand.

jimi you chatroom nazi - why do you have to post so much? the same thing over and over - shut the fuck up for once hahahahaha you zed and Mc donalds lover you!

should i take the bait, should i take the bait...... should i? nah, i know youre jokin ben ;)
hahaha mcdonalds is goin straight to heaven baby

i am interested in putting my 2 cents worth into the shihad debate and it is also with some reluctance. i am saddened by the fact that peoples opinions are met with childish replys and spitefull comments. the point is opinions are exactly that and eveyone is entitled to them. sure the tom/mike debate started that way with both of them showing a certain immaturity, name calling, accusations etc. i was then very glad to see the debate started with mike (i think) admitting to and apologising for the shit slinging. so let me state here that anything i post is my 'opinion' and not supposed to be right or wrong.
i have followed shihads progress with much interest over the years, the changes in music, look, attitude etc. i also find the comments (from everyone, not just mike) about the old stuff being better than the new stuff very interesting. how many times have i heard that in regard to head like a hole's '13'. "13's the best album maaaan, why dont you guys play more stuff off 13?" etc etc. speaking for myself between the ages of 19 and 30, from '13' through to 'kiss it or shoot it' i have gone through alot of changes from personal opinions to musical taste and preferances. heres a challange for anyone, think about what your musical tastes are now and think about what they where 10 years ago. are you still listening to the same stuff? are you listening to music you once hated and swore youd never like? what im getting at is how everyone changes and ive always found the concept of 'selling out' a difficult one epecially when its directed at a new zealand rock band. what i mean is when it comes to the crunch of writing new material it goes back to the basics of 4 or 5 people in a room creating music together and whats created is from the peoples taste, personality and skill. often (from my experience) the good stuff that comes seemingly from nowhere and often as suprising to the people making it as it is to the people who eventually get to hear it. for example, when the song 'cornbag' emerged from the collective unconciousness of hlah we all thought 'what the fuck?' it was kinda poppy, had a sing-along chorus and felt really weird. we never really had any intention of playing it and somehow it became a single (which didnt sell well) and a video. then playing live the reraction to it was even more surprising, people really liked it. what im getting at here is what is 'selling out' does someone sit down and study the charts, whats hip with the kids, whats happening here and there and then try to create their own version of it? funnily enough i remember walking down manners mall when the general electric had just come out and hearing some song being blasted from the shop and thinking 'this must be some new american band' then i heard the singing and went 'hang on, thats johnnys voice' much to my surprise. upon actually getting the album and having an open minded listen to it my personal opinion was that they bridged the gap between killjoy and the fish album and had actually managed to combine catchy songwriting with the wall of guitar sound still keep it shihad.
i have to end here because im in a shitty internet cafe and these places fucking rob me. i will comment further.
thought - who know what the next shihad album will soundlike? no-one, but imagine if it was brutally hard and heavy, what then the fish and gen electric fans dissapointed?

hemi - thankyou!! - this is an elegant, thoughtful and right-on-the-money response. But then HLAH always had their won speical way of putting things and it all coming out righ. I'm so pleased that tis site gets this sort of input from the brilliant musical people that walk in our midst. Most perfect post i've seen in a long time ... if there was an award you'd get it ... peace.

Hey there,

I'm interested in hearing Mike define a 'more artistic' direction. Does he mean 'less commercial?' And by less commercial does he mean they are selling too many records, enjoying too much success? Don't they deserve it? Do you like anything on the radio?

For the record, I don't like much on the radio, but I don't mind Shihad at all. Also D-super's '16 songs' is pretty catchy! Can art be catchy?

Or does he refer to the amount of radio-friendly singles the boys seem to be churning out. How much 'art' ever makes it to radio? Do you really think they must have lost touch with something to gain so much airplay? Was it a sales-conscious, market based decision, do you think, as opposed to an artistic progression?

You have yet to explain yourself, Mr Hunt, I'm very interested.

When's Tom gonna answer the live questions, dammit??

no matter how many times people ask for it we are not getting any answers to this "more artistic" thing!!!! Mike.... are you ever going to provide us with an insight into what you meant by that comment???

yesh....where are those guys?i lost my copy of churn so i went to re-buy it yesterday. WHen at the counter the guy was tellling me how much he loved the album and we were having a jolly old chat about the band. Now what i thought was wierd was that he said "you know, this album is awesome, but this would have to be the first copy of it we have ever sold."
THe c.d store i brought it from is this HUGE jbhifi store in the centre of melb city and probably the biggest Cd store in melbourne. what the hell?!

Also just listening to churn, i see where mike is coming from, but then again it's absolutely rediculous to expect a band never to change their style. I like all their stuff equally....its almost like listening ot each album their a different band. and that's good.

Someone was saying how the general electric is poor lyrically (mike i think) Well i was reading through TGE lyrics last night and i actually thought they were very tongue in cheek and very clever.

Well ta-ta. love the peachster

Well I guess I'm a bit lte to be in on any debate w/ Mike bizz but I think my angle may be of some interest......When I was around 16 i lived in a shitty town called cambridge just out of Hammo (another shit town) and was real into Metallica/ Sabbath/ Accadacca etc.....My mate Benji scored a copy of Devolve which I thought was fuckin wicked (especially the guitar solos Mike)...I went on a drunken bus ride to the Metallica show @ the supertop w/ shihad supporting....Oh my god where were the GUITAR solos and speed metal riffs ...I thought they'd turned to shit. The reality is I just didn't get it. Then the Album which they were working on @ the time Churn came out and I got it....Fuck it was cool. I listened to it everyday and then went to the 1st bdo and saw Shihad and HLAH on the main stage...fuckin awesome. Went back to shitty Cambridge and packed my drums of for Welli w/ the attitude that if these guys can from here so can I.....fast foward two years and I meet Nigel Regan and Thomas Watson (fuck I was like a little groupie kid he he(oh hang on I was) it was a total buzz for me) anyway they happened to need a drummer in a band called Baconfoot, There was a house in Wellington where they lived as well as Phill K and Jonny as well at one point so I got to meet and hang with all these guys just jammin and getting high. Then Baconfoot was asked to do a tour w/ Shihad as they roadtested their new stuff (later to become Fish)...at first I thought the new stuff was an odd departure but as the tour progressed the more I got into it.....you have to realise this was gutsy shit. They could've easily done another Killjoy (oh your precious killjoy) and kept people like you happy but they did'nt. Oh my god Jon was singing (like actually singing) and his lyrics were more honest ie: I really miss my girlfreind/ it's good to be back home etc....Not the kind of buried in the mix stuff that industrial/metal fans love. So there was strange reactions most everywhere they went on that one. My point being that they went for something different, a move foward, sideways, backward whatever it was it wasn't a massive commercial sucsess but never once over drinks or smokes or coffee did any of them bitch about this to me ... I don't think it mattered to them, They were proud of it and were still travelling around playing music and having fun, fun Mike.....do you have fun in your record store everyday?????????Nah, didn't think so. So maybe some people move on and some don't......Oh and if we could have heaps of speakers on stage we probably would and Jonny getting into it is actually him becoming more comfortable on stage and putting on a show and Phill lifted his game recently as well on ya Phill......Basically Mike I feel sorry for you man can't you just find another band to champion untill they develop into something you hate and so on and so on untill you can't hear anymore because bands you hate have ruined your hearing? I know your gonna hate me ...I am in a band called Cassette who are currently considering selling out big time......feel free to slag us please for a change we could do with the exposure...we have guitar solos....ohhhhhhhh. Anyway back to the board room for a musical direction stratergy meeting with the record company.......I will not post anymore shit here.....cause I'm just off to get on w/ my life.....Love Craig T

reading that was awesome....thanks for the insight craig. I'll have to hear your bands out.
Im thinking that mike has realised that shihad have changed for the better and is reconsidering selling the fish album! yesh....wishful thinking,,,no not even that...i don't really care all that much. But Now everyone has seen the different views of people around the band,.....................thanks

maybe the ex-fan can critique my site...

herein lies a new shihad site. it's a shameless plug as it is my blood, sweat and tears which got it to what it is right now. the primary focus is a news / forum based. have a look and should you feel inclined to offer feedback, please do so in the forum.

http://www.static-ecstasy.com/

shit..where was i when this was happening.

ah well.. seems to late now to comment now but anyway. what is with all this shit about the fish album. I was a bogan/hippie when churn was out, so i like d it. i as less of a bogan when killjoy came out so i loved it. when the fish album came out there was hardley a bogan bone in my body so i loved it.

I did not notice a huge musical change in direction because I and the rest of the world was moving onwards as well. Obviously i noticed fishes poppier tracks but i also noticed the boys got haircuts and started to connect with what was happening with the rest of the world.

What i love and have always loved about the had is that while evolving in an everchanging musical climate they have remained honest in their music and have always kept some of their distintice wellingotn rock sound. If you come from wellington you know wehat i mean.

but first and foremost their songs fucking rule. I don't care if they pull a radiohead and release an ambient dance inspired album because i like most other intelligent people enjoy all types of music and know that good songwriting wins everytime.

I am interested to hear what tom has to say about the "live" comments not becasue i agree with mike but because i know the majority of bands the world over have this problem. One of my saddest moments was seeing radiohead in wellington. Sad???? why, well about 4 months earlier i had seen a tape of a radiohead gig in the U.K on the same tour and had it memorised, well they played song for song the same order and the same stage production and banter as on the video.

While this kinda spoiled the gig for me at the time and really dampned my passion for live gigs i have remained a radiohead fan and continue going to every gig under the sun because i unerstand that bands have ridiculous tour schedules and though they may say "hello wellington" or "you're the best audience we've ever had" it's all part of the show that the majority of the crowd have come to see.

The recent robbie williams gig in wellington was a perfect example of this, every little piece of banter he did in between songs was part of the rehearsed show, He just changed names of cities etc to fit in. when people are paying $100 for a ticket they don't care if he tells other people the same things as long as he makes them feel special like they are the only audience in the world and he want's to sleep with every women in the audience.

I love it when john say's "fucking awesome" cause it is, just like the song it is becomming his "trademark", just like when Paul from brubeck cracks out his "thank you very fuckin much" at the end of every song.

Give the guys credit they are songwriters not comedians, they write songs not banter, how can you expect to hear the best motherfucking songs in the world during a bands 3 month 2456 date tour and also hear brand new original banter, even comedians just repeat the same tied jokes evening after evening on their tours and they get paid to write funny comments. Jon could read the obiturays for all i care I went to the gig to hear some ball busting stadium riffage and beautiful songs. I think Mike got confused and expected to see Chris ROCK not a rock'n'roll show from hell.

I do miss hearing the older tracks at gigs but i find ignorant cunts who say "aw fuck, they didn't play all the fucking b-sides on the debs night out E.P", christ if shihad played everyone of the songs we wanted them to play they would have to play their own 3 day woodstock. however it goes without saying that i would wet my pants if they played bitter or stations on their next tour.

....idea....for shihads next tour.

put a voting form on website for people to vote for the 5 had songs they want to hear most live and then the winning 5 the band could play on their next tour.

anyway.. i hope this thread continues

Keep writing the kick ass songs and I'll keep on coming

Well said, man!

I really resonate with something Tomble said about being honest. There is no pay-off for allowing the music of your soul to be corrupted, or to physically alter the way you write music to fit what's popular. The best records come from musicians who aren't followers, but innovators, following their songs wherever they take them.

Do you think you know Shihad better than they do themselves, Mike Hunt? Big call, I know, but it would seem that's what it boils down to.

-with respect,

hey my friend said that Tom is half Maori
is that true?

y'know one thing (among the other, more obivous ponits) that confused me once mike hunt wrote his top 5 albums/shows is this: mike's lists representing his musical taste/openness are quite contradictory to his very much conservative and narrow-minded approach to the shihad musical evolution. I'm surprised that someone (and I assume that mike hunt also knows of the other works of sonic youth, mogwai etc) who listens (and I don't mean "listening" as in the absend-minded attentiveness as set aside for the tinny melodies you get in an elevator) to artists such as the above mentioned, can react in this way to a change in colour of mucical style which would actually recquire much less open-mindedness or acceptance to adjust to... is you get the picture.
I gotta say I was dissappointed in the off-hand way mike replied to Tom's detailed attempts to describe "the way it was" and I really hope he pulled something out of it which will quieten him down.
Onya Tom!

um, ok just want to clear something up. change is good. i'm glad shihad changed, otherwise they'd still be that terrible metal band, all bands must evolve. its the way they went that i'm questioning. it would seem moving towards what is popular on radio/tv, what big names you can get on your latest album and what celebs we can hang out with is more important than developing on a sound that i think could have been truly unique.
"the general electric producer has produced other great acts such as...motley crue!!??"...nuff said on that one.
"our latest album is done by the same guy who produced korn, limp bizkit and staind"...um choice guys, can't wait!
someone mentioned radiohead earlier, and i think what they've done is brilliant they could have knocked out another album of fairly straight up pop songs but chose to experiment more and come out with something more challenging that left them open for criticism. it's not perfect by any stretch, sales were down but its still a more honest musical expression.
i pleasently surprised when churn was released. i was and have never been a metal fan (although it would seem some of you thought that). churn had the aggression aspect but in a context i could grasp more than codpieces and leather. then came killjoy a NATURAL step forward from churn. to me the general electric is a step back to the metal years, and what i'm hearing about the new one even more so. i guess we'll just have to wait and see(sic). couple of questions: do think it is possible to make a career from playing music, whilst maintaining integrity? and do you consider music art? feel free to answer.

Motley Crüe were the undeniable champions of the 80's glam metal scene, please don't take the piss out of my boys. Without 'Girls,Girls,Girls' no strip bar scene in a movie would be the same, and you know it.

Ice cream eating motherfucker.

May Tico Torres strangle you with his arm hair.

living off playing music whilst maintaining integrity VERSUS is music art

or simplified down... "career art" ... this is an oxymoron

Hey there,

I'm interested in hearing Mike define a 'more artistic' direction. Does he mean 'less commercial?' And by less commercial does he mean they are selling too many records, enjoying too much success? Don't they deserve it? Do you like anything on the radio?

For the record, I don't like much on the radio, but I don't mind Shihad at all. Also D-super's '16 songs' is pretty catchy! Can art be catchy?

Or does he refer to the amount of radio-friendly singles the boys seem to be churning out. How much 'art' ever makes it to radio? Do you really think they must have lost touch with something to gain so much airplay? Was it a sales-conscious, market based decision, do you think, as opposed to an artistic progression?

You have yet to explain yourself, Mr Hunt, I'm very interested.
foetusboy

I Posted this ages ago, Mike- Whassup?

hey there ho there...
i just read through a majority of those posts and have come to the conclusion that mike, in each of your posts, you dig yourself deeper into your hole....you seem to keep repeating yourself about how "i like the old stuff betta" blah blah....but then you turn around and say "change is good" ??? make up your mind....i think you dont really know what your talking about any more. Tomble fired back pretty impressive comments that answered all your questions.....but you never continued to stand for your cause.....and now you just keep going back to the issue on change!!

now are you actually intending on replying to these posts by furthring your arguement with meaning?? or would you much rather shy away with your foot in your fat ol' mouth??? ;)

I know everyone would be delighted to hear from you....

PeAcE....

u r so majestic so skillful in the way u make me sick... thanxs jon,tom,karl,phil 4 provding those lyrics of (1 at least) my all time fav shihad songs leo song, nuthing else needs to be said except that every1 thinks ur a spineless C***sucker (there will be sum youngins :)) u guys r great cause i thought there weren't many had fans but there r!, thanx shihad 4 sum of the best songs EVA!!!!!!!
p.s. tomble u explained so much stuff that i had wondered bout, & i admire u guys even more as people & as musicians

"otherwise they'd still be that terrible metal band"
mike hunt

mike, didn't u say that thier music circa killjoy was the best they've made???? cause u'r seeming to imply that if shihad hadn't changed/evolved, they'd be "terrible" shit, u can't come from both sides! its one side or the other not both man.

p.s. im sorry bout calling u a coaksucker, u could be like my best friend for all i know, i disagree with ur opinion, but not u :)

p.p.s where ohh where has jimi gone? im not seenin much of him now :(

As a musical "artist" I can personally say that when you start writing and all you're in a different place than the present. A perfect example of this besides Shihad (tho another perfect one) is a band thats been around even longer - Metallica. Theyre received much slag over "going soft" by metal purists. One of my best buds is Kirk's cousin, and he can attest to the fact that these guys have gone thru a lot of changes as humans: death of a mate (Cliff), becoming parents, etc. So my point is: an artist can't be expected to remain in the same "place" forever! And to me thats the beauty of it. I love the more current Shihad music, but just the same I like DEVOLVE and all the older stuff as well. I guess that's just what being a fan is all about!

jimi.....where are you......?