Mäori and Pacific Health: Evidence

Inequalities in health affecting Mäori and Pacific
peoples

Evidence that the health experience of New Zealanders is sharply divided along ethnic lines has been steadily accruing over the last 20 years. A clear pattern has emerged demonstrating poorer health among Mäori compared with non-Mäori (Pomare et al 1995). More recently, research has shown that Pacific peoples also experience poorer health than European/Other New Zealanders (Ministry of Health 1999a).
The unequal position of Mäori health results from a combination of factors (National Health Committee 1998), including poorer social and economic status; the impact of discrimination (including institutional and personal racism (Jones 2000)); higher levels of behavioural risk
factors, such as smoking; and lower access to or effectiveness of some health services (Pomare and de Boer 1988). Significant interrelationships exist among these factors, and a fuller understanding of the determinants of Mäori health continues to evolve.
Factors impacting on the health of Pacific peoples are less well studied but are likely to be similar to those affecting Mäori. Poorer social and economic circumstances are likely to account for a substantial proportion of excess ill health affecting Pacific peoples (Ministry of Health 1997b).
In a paper developed for the National Health Committee, Woodward and Kawachi identified four major arguments in favour of reducing health inequalities due to social, cultural and economic factors (Woodward and Kawachi 1998):

• Inequalities in health are inherently unfair, especially in circumstances where personal responsibility is least relevant. The Treaty of Waitangi places further emphasis on the health of Mäori (Durie 1998).

• Reduction in health inequalities benefits everyone, largely because the conditions that lead to health inequalities are detrimental to all society, but also because some consequences of health inequalities have obvious spill-over effects (for example, infectious diseases).

• Health inequalities are largely avoidable.

• Interventions to reduce health inequalities may be cost-effective (although further information on this issue is required).

Comments?

external link ]

Forums: The Bar,

...and then today the government kneecapped the opposition. Pertinent points are:

"Ethnicity - which at present is worth $54 million in Public Health Organisation funding - is to be replaced with morbidity and mortality rates as funding measures.

"Funding based on ethnicity would continue in cases where it was proved to have been effective, such as the Maori and Pacific Island women's cervical screening programme."

Also to be changed or axed are maori targetted education scholarships and grants.

external link ]

Rodney Hide says this finally proves that race based programmes have become endemic under labour & accused them of weasel words.
Tariana Turia complained maori have been relegated to "yet another ethnic minority in their own land".
NZ First and National both accused the Government of plagiarising their policies. Well, duh.

I have to admit, it does show the strength of having an effective opposition in a democracy. Thanks Don.

I think this is a step in the right direction as long as they truly do keep funding where it has been working.

Yeah, as far as health goes, they reckon there will be very little actual difference in where the money goes.

//Tariana Turia complained maori have been relegated to "yet another ethnic minority in their own land". //

...

Big paper, huh... (re link above^) MOH think so too...

:"the Ministry of Health has indicated that the proposed recommendations resulting from these reviews will require a large number of follow-up actions for the Ministry. This has resourcing and timing implications, which unless amended will impact on its capacity to undertake other planned work"

Note that targetted funding has not been eliminated by this 'needs based' review... I really don't like how 'need' is referred to in oppostion to 'ethnicity', as though ethnicity = no need.

:"Fourteen programmes will continue unchanged as sufficient evidence has been provided as to their effectiveness and the targeting is appropriate. There is a need to continue to review these programmes to ensure that the need remains and that they are effective."
http://www.labour.org.nz/labour_team/mps/mps/trevor_mallard/news/revies2...

Here's another important cabinet paper from 2003 on ethnic mortality trends in New Zealand, 'Decades of Disparity... 1980 - 1999'

:"Inequalities in access to and decisions over resources are the primary cause of health inequalities. Differential access to health services – and in the quality of care provided to patients – also contribute to unequal health outcomes. These structural inequalities may explain more of ethnic inequalities in health than is often recognised. Existing measures may not fully capture the dimensions and impacts of socioeconomic position relevant for different ethnic groups; cross sectional studies fail to take the effect of cumulative disadvantage over the lifecourse into account."
http://www.moh.govt.nz/moh.nsf/0/febdcf2d4baae173cc256d5c00137cae/$FILE/EthnicMortalityTrends.pdf

I'd like to see more research into rates of recovery, resistance to antibiotics/treatment, etc on the basis of ethnicity- can anyone help me find some stats?

external link ]

(...and I'm giving up on html tags for a wee while- sorry bout this! It affects all the text in the 'latest posts' view as well... how embarassing...)

What ever happened to the music?