ok, only thsoe who consider themselves got wheels enough, post in this blog,
the topic is improvements on the site:
meantime
ok, only thsoe who consider themselves got wheels enough, post in this blog,
the topic is improvements on the site:
meantime
Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Technorati
Comments
I'm confused. Is this a good
I'm confused. Is this a good or bad thing? Feedback always golden.
A bit of feedback - I liked
A bit of feedback - I liked how when you clicked on '2 new' or whatever, the page auto-flicked down to the aforementioned new posts. Why has it stopped doing so?
Also, I really do like the new design in general, but the two major issues for me are the fact that the big black title/ad bar across the top of each page grates against the rest of the design tone, and a lack of segmentation/bordering on pages - posts and writing and symbols all just seem to be floating in a sea of white.
Oh, and how come 'usernodes' have started popping up on the 'recent posts' page?
well jimi, to be fair, your
well jimi, to be fair, your vocablary has lifted a notch, and far be it from be to suggest that this is anything to do with the bruising and shrinkage.
intellectual?
7.8
NZM am surprised you posted
NZM am surprised you posted in this section. no question a bolter. opportunistic. but ok, intellectualism
flat 5
Le freak, c'est chic, freak
Le freak, c'est chic, freak out.
a fairly hard out 17
a fairly hard out 17
Rope, randomly posting and
Rope, randomly posting and not "replying" to a previous comment, deduct 10 points.
Misspelling "those" in blog post, deduct a further 20 points.
It's looking a bit shaky for you.
no i reject that i want a
no i reject that
i want a second opinion
noone posted on the subject of the blog
people read the title
and then completely ignored the body of the blog
and then jumped in with their own little whinges about the site
so sincerely and heartily fuck your lawn
what is rope's blog if it's not rope's?
no more of your hijecks
Isn't one of the fundamental
Isn't one of the fundamental rules of blogging having a relevant title to the body of the blog article? :P
no http://myspace.com/erbaiw
no
http://myspace.com/erbaiwu
ban this rebel
ban this rebel
...fuck your
...fuck your lawn...
Bwahahahahaha! Brilliant! That's made my day, that has. Ahahahahahaha! Man, that's right up there with Neil Pye's "Bad vibes on your loons".
Sorry if "Fuck your lawn" is a really common phrase in NZ these days and nothing to write a post about. I've been away since... well, since not long after Neil Pye said "Bad vibes on your loons", so I'm not up to date with these things.
Ahhhh man, "fuck your lawn"... [exits giggling and wiping eyes]
gotcha! Hopefully the
gotcha! Hopefully the chnages aren't oo annoying, and generally are small improvements each time. Plenty ahead! ;)
NZM PLZ HELP. Posts that
NZM PLZ HELP. Posts that were previously deleted are now not deleted. Mucha mierda that I'd really really like not to be re-confronted with, thankyou.
Aw crap. That could be a
Aw crap. That could be a tough one, definitely an oversight on our part. I'll see what the programmer types might be able to do.
In the meantime (and possibly long term) you can delete offending posts as I've upgraded you to moderator (again).
Wow. So er, there could be
Wow. So er, there could be some quite interesting content floating round.
quite quite interesting
quite quite interesting
so heather, obviously barely
so heather, obviously barely woth making an appearance, somewhere in the 20-25 region
lime green, yeah i couldn't comment objectively so i got a mate to score you based on 5 random posts
he put you up in the mid 0.4s
nice one all. thanks for the contribrutions and proofreading
I'm finding the whole
I'm finding the whole blog+forum thing a bit awkward... seems like you'd be better to drop the blogs and simply have people post their bloggy thoughts on the forum... from what I've seen so far, most people are writing things in their blog that'd be relevant discussion threads.
nice one autistk 3 and but
nice one autistk
3
and but yes!
we are almost intellectual enough,
further contribution welcomed